Alaska's Rare Alexander Archipelago Wolves Nearly Wiped Out in 1 Year

Only about 60 of these now critically-endangered wolves remain on Prince of Wales Island

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


These are dire times for one of the world’s rarest wolf subspecies. Over the past year one of the most important populations* of Alaska’s Alexander Archipelago wolves (Canis lupus ligoni) has plummeted from 221 to as low as 60, according to data released last week. As a result, conservation groups—which have sought to protect the rare wolves under the Endangered Species Act for years—are now calling for emergency steps to preserve the few wolves that remain.

Named after the southeastern Alaskan island chain, Alexander Archipelago wolves are smaller and lighter than other North American wolves, from which they have been isolated for millennia. They rely almost exclusively on a single prey species, Sitka black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis), although the wolves have been known to eat salmon a few months out of the year. Both the wolves and the deer have suffered over the past few decades as logging has eroded their island habitats.

Unfortunately for both species, the humans living and working on Prince of Wales Island and other remote islands also like to hunt deer. “I think the big problem is that some hunters see wolves as competitors for deer,” says Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “Because old-growth logging has reduced habitat for Sitka black-tailed deer, wolves and humans are competing for fewer deer.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Alexander Archipelago wolves are not yet a protected species, so hunting them is currently legal. Until earlier this year hunters were allowed to harvest up to 30 percent of the wolf population on Prince of Wales Island, the archipelago’s biggest land mass and the home of a genetically isolated population of the wolves. In January the Alaska Board of Game lowered that to 20 percent, an acknowledgment that the animals were already declining too quickly.

But quite a few more wolves than that were lost this year. A briefing paper released by the U.S. Forest Service on May 29 found that the wolf population on Prince of Wales and other nearby islands had declined from 221 in 2013 to just 89 in 2014. Then during the 2014–2015 hunting season, another 29 wolves were reported killed.

So how did this wolf population decline so rapidly? A study published in 2008 found that almost half the wolf deaths were caused by their being hunted or trapped out of season. This means quite a few more wolves could have been killed this past year than were reported. Some of them could also have been killed by cars, although that seems unlikely to have made up the difference.

Where does the wolf population stand today? We don’t know yet if any new pups have joined the population since the 2014 survey but it seems unlikely that there would be many. The Forest Service also reported the remaining wolves now skew 75 percent male.

As for the future, the wolves face a greater threat of not having enough to eat as deer populations seem likely to shrink. The islands’ old-growth forests, which have now been heavily logged in many places, used to prevent undergrowth. Clear-cutting gives way to “thick, dense second-growth, a habitat that is unusable for deer,” Noblin says.

That logging could get ever worse. Several conservation groups sued in 2014 to block a major logging project, the biggest that Prince of Wales Island has seen in decades. That lawsuit is ongoing.

Meanwhile, we still have a lot to learn about the Alexander Archipelago wolf, including not just how they use their habitat—only one animal currently carries a radio collar—but if they even are a separate subspecies. Scientists have been debating this last point back and forth this year in the Journal of Heredity with no signs that either side is ready to settle.

Here’s what we do know, though: At the rate this wolf population is declining, we don’t have much time left for debate if we want to save them from extinction.

Photo © Robin Silver, courtesy of the Center for Biological Diversity

* Note (6/15/15): This article has been corrected to reflect the population decline on Prince of Wales and related islands. Alexander Archipelago wolves also exist on a few other islands and the nearby mainland.

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe