An "extinct" plant species is saved, just in time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In the conservation world, there’s a concept known as a "Lazarus" species: Those thought to be extinct, but later rediscovered.

Take Aspalathus recurvispina, for example. This little plant with yellow flowers disappeared from South Africa years ago, and for the last decade has been considered probably extinct. But a few months ago, eagle-eyed members of a plant protection group spotted a single plant in an area about to be paved for a new road.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thinking the plant was actually another endangered species, Aspalathus cliffortiifolia, the workers had a sample tested, which revealed its true identity. Once that happened, conservation agencies stopped the road work last month long enough to find a few other samples nearby.

They located it just in time: The road was being built in anticipation of 2010's World Cup soccer tournament. (Read about a similar situation in Vancouver as that city prepares for the 2010 Olympics.)

"Had conservation officials not stopped the road widening process, the population would have been lost," says Ismail Ebrahim, Project Manager for Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) at the South African National Biodiversity Institute, headquartered in Pretoria.

The plant was originally believed extinct "because of the major loss of habitat in the Port Elizabeth area," says Ebrahim. "Humewood, the suburb that it was re-found in, is currently a residential area and there are only a few small natural open spaces left."

Keeping the plant alive in its native habitat is going to be a tough task. "The most important thing for us to do is to ensure that the remaining habitat is secure and conserved," says Ebrahim. "This might be very challenging because (the plant) occurs in a very small patch alongside a busy road."

The habitat is also adjacent to a residential area, so it will be difficult to protect the site. "We will have to engage the local authorities to come up with the viable solution to conserving this species," says Ebrahim.

CREW also hope to have the land reclassified as a "no-development" zone under the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Open Space System, which allows towns to use conservation as a priority in establishing open spaces. They might also explore the possibility of ex-situ (off-site) conservation, but that "is also extremely challenging," says Ebrahim.

Meanwhile, to help protect the plant, the South African National Biodiversity Institute, which is charged with assessing the threat status of South Africa's species, has classified Aspalathus recurvispina as "critically endangered," which offers it some legal protection.

Ebrahim says that CREW will also soon send samples of Aspalathus recurvispina to the Millennium Seed Bank in the UK, so they have a backup if conservation efforts fail.

With a bit of luck, what happened to a Philippine bird a few weeks back won’t happen to A. recurvispina. That bird, the Worcester's buttonquai, once believed to be extinct, was rediscovered.

Then it was eaten.

Image: Aspalathus recurvispina © Cornelia Garner. Used with permission.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe