Bat-Killing Fungus Now Found in 25 U.S. States

The news for bats in the U.S. keeps getting worse. Last week conservation officials announced that the bat-killing white-nose syndrome (WNS) has been found in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The news for bats in the U.S. keeps getting worse. Last week conservation officials announced that the bat-killing white-nose syndrome (WNS) has been found in Michigan and Wisconsin. The disease, spread by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd), has now reached 25 states and five Canadian provinces since it first turned up in New York State in 2006. Afflicted bat populations often have mortality rates approaching 100 percent once they become infected. More than six million bats have died since the disease emerged.

There is no treatment for the fungus or disease. The fungus thrives in cold, damp caves that are impossible to decontaminate.

According to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, WNS has been found in three of Michigan's 83 counties: Alpena, Dickinson and Mackinac. "These are the first confirmed WNS cases in Michigan," Dan O'Brien, DNR wildlife veterinarian, said in a press release. "Even though we've known this disease was coming, it is a disappointing day. We will now shift gears and try to stop the spread." The counties are not contiguous, so it seems likely that the fungus is also present in other locations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So far, Wisconsin's WNS cases appear to be much more limited; the disease has only been found in a single mine in Grant County, where 2 percent of the bats showed signs of the disease. Again, the discovery of the disease in Wisconsin was not unexpected. "The discovery is not a surprise but it's a sad day for Wisconsin," Erin Crain, director of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Conservation Program, said in another press release. "With great cooperation from mine and cave owners, we took aggressive steps to prevent human spread of the disease to Wisconsin, and we think those steps helped delay its arrival by several years, allowing more time for research and to learn from other states' experiences... We face the loss of multiple bat species and the benefits they provide to our ecosystems and our people."

Both states have set up Web sites (Michigan, Wisconsin) where citizens can report any dead or infected bats they encounter.

The Pd fungus has been found in an additional three states (Iowa, Minnesota and Oklahoma), but WNS mortalities have not yet been reported there.

Main photo: A little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) from Avery County, N.C., with fungus on its nose, by Gabrielle Graeter/NCWRC. WNS spread map via whitenosesyndrome.org

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe