Can the last 20 Christmas Island pipistrelle bats be saved? Ask Midnight Oil's former lead singer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Collectively, the world's last 20 Christmas Island pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus murrayi) weigh less than a fifth of a pound (around 60 grams). That's not much mass for any species – let alone one on the razor's edge of extinction.

It's been a rough few years for this tiny Australian micobat. Once fairly common on its home island, populations have dropped dramatically in the last decade, first to 100 bats in 1994, then to 54 three years ago. Today, according to Lindy Lumsden, a research scientist at Australia's Department of Sustainability and Environment, there may be just 20 left. Lumsden now warns the Christmas Island pipistrelle may be extinct in as little as six months if the current rate of decline continues.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So what's causing the bats' disappearance? No one knows for sure. Most of Christmas Island is a national park, so the bats' habitat is protected. The area features an abundance of insects, so they should have plenty of food.

But Christmas Island has also become home to several invasive, introduced species, including black rats, feral cats, and tree-climbing Asian wolf snakes, which could all be predating upon the bats. The yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) has also caused great damage to many Christmas island species, including its famous red crabs, and could be killing the bats as well.

Disease could also be a possibility, although Lumsden's research, published on the website of the Australian Bat Society, hosted by Charles Stuart University, Thurgoona, Australia, has not turned up any evidence of such.

In order to save the pipistrelle from extinction, Lumsden has proposed gathering all of the bats from the wild and creating a captive colony, where they can breed in safety. "If sufficient animals can be caught and they acclimatise to captivity," she writes, "a commitment will then need to be made to a long-term (10-year) breeding program to enable sufficient animals to be bred for a release program."

Lumsden has pled for support from the Australian government, a call Minister for Environment Peter Garrett today declined, saying there are "unacceptably high risks involved in embarking on an immediate captive breeding program," and "the bats are also very hard to catch and no one knows how to keep them alive for breeding." (Evidently, to paraphrase Midnight Oil—the band Garrett used to front—you cansleep while the bats are dying.)

So is this the end of the line for the Christmas Island pipistrelle? For now, it's a waiting game.

Bonus: See our in-depth report for more on bats.

Image: Common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), a relative of the Christmas Island pipistrelle, via Wikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe