China's Yangtze Finless Porpoise Faces 80 Percent Decrease in 30 Years

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The already rare Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis) faces an 80 percent drop in its population over the next 30 years, according to research by the Institute of Hydrobiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Currently, around 1,000 of the freshwater porpoises live in China's Yangtze River and its surrounding lakes, down from 2,700 in 1991 and 2,000 in the year 2000. That number continues to drop 6.4 percent a year, according to Wang Ding, principal investigator for the Institute, who told the Xinhua News Agency, "The next 10 years will be a critical period for the conservation of this species."

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, "porpoise habitat in the Yangtze has been degraded by water development, including the Gezhouba and Three Gorges dams and about 1,300 smaller dams in tributaries." The river is also heavily polluted by sewage and industrial runoff, according to the World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) 2007 report, World's Top 10 Rivers at Risk. A 2008 study, also by Wang Ding, found that many finless dolphins were dying from exposure to mercury, insecticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and other pollutants.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to the loss of quality freshwater habitat, the survey team also found that the presence of a large number of vessels on the Yangtze River, a major shipping route, could be causing the porpoises to breed less frequently, a troubling situation for a species that already has a low reproductive rate. According to the WWF, finless porpoises have an 11-month gestation period and give birth to just a single calf at a time.

Fishing, both legal and illegal, has also threatened the porpoises. Starting in the 1990s less scrupulous fishermen started employing a technique called electro-fishing, which discharged a lethal electric current into the water, killing everything in it for 20 meters around their boats, according to the Zoological Society of London.

Until recently, little was known about finless porpoises. Genetic tests conducted in 2010 revealed the Yangtze population to be genetically different from other finless porpoises that live in coastal waters of the South China and Yellow seas.

The Yangtze was also home to the baiji (Lipotes vexillifer), a freshwater dolphin that was declared functionally extinct in 2007.

Photo: Finless black porpoise, a related subspecies, by Kenichi Nobusue via Flickr. Used under Creative Commons license

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe