Could an Artificial Cave Help Protect Bats from Deadly Fungus?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The deadly fungal infection known as white-nose syndrome (WNS) has killed at least a million bats since it was first observed in 2006. In some areas more than 90 percent of the bats have been wiped out. Scientists have been behind the eight ball in their efforts to protect bats from this mysterious and devastating threat, which disrupts the mammals' ability to regulate their body temperature during hibernation—but now we have two good bits of news to share.

First off, the cause of WNS has at last been conclusively determined: a fungus called Geomyces destructans. The fungus was already the primary suspect for WNS, but a study published last week in Naturemakes the link conclusively.

Anne Kinsinger, associate director of Ecosystems for the U.S. Geological Survey, said in a prepared statement that linking G. destructans to WNS will help scientists and conservation groups protect bats as we enter the winter months when the fungus is more active: "By identifying what causes WNS, this study will greatly enhance the ability of decision-makers to develop management strategies to preserve vulnerable bat populations and the ecosystem services that they provide in the U.S. and Canada."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One management strategy is already in the planning stages in Tennessee, where WNS hasn't quite gained a foothold yet but has already made its presence known. Because WNS is too hard to wipe out in natural ecosystems, conservation groups are trying to move bats out of their normal caves to a more sterile environment. They're doing this by building an artificial cave.

The pilot project—being planned now by The Nature Conservancy in partnership with the University of Tennessee Knoxville and Bat Conservation International—will involve building an artificial cave with walls that mimic natural limestone but which can be easily disinfected with antifungal agents. They'll build it next an existing bat cave and hope the bats will switch homes. "The fungus is really susceptible to a lot of things, such as heat and antifungal agents," Corey Holliday, Cave and Karst Program director for The Nature Conservancy in Tennessee, told Nooga.com, "but you can't do what needs to be done in a natural cave setting because it would destroy other cave life forms, as well," Holliday says. "This artificial cave is a pilot project, but if it works, we are hopeful that we can build a lot of these things."

The groups hope to break ground on the faux cave next year. They have raised one third of the project's projected $300,000 price tag.

It's too early to tell if this project will be a success, but with our nation's bats at stake, it's a good idea that deserves attention.

Photo: Image: Bats exhibiting signs of white-nose syndrome. Photo by Al Hicks; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Via U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe