Critically Endangered Frog Claws Its Way toward Recovery

The evolutionarily unique frogs of Cameroon's Lake Oku have no tongues, claw-tipped toes and 12 full sets of chromosomes. What the Lake Oku clawed frogs (Xenopus longipes) don't have, however, is a lot of habitat in which to live.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The evolutionarily unique frogs of Cameroon’s Lake Oku have no tongues, claw-tipped toes and 12 full sets of chromosomes. What the Lake Oku clawed frogs (Xenopus longipes) don’t have, however, is a lot of habitat in which to live. They only exist in a tiny mountaintop lake more than 2,200 meters above sea level. Although they face little predation there, the species did encounter an as-yet-unexplained mass mortality event between 2006 and 2010 that killed off dozens, if not hundreds, of these critically endangered frogs.

“The species seems to be doing okay in its natural habitat at the moment,” says Ben Tapley, the head of the reptile and amphibian team for the Zoological Society of London (ZSL). That doesn’t mean they’re safe, though: “Due to living in just one area, they are incredibly vulnerable to the threats of invasive species or a disease outbreak,” he says.

That’s where the ZSL comes in. This year the organization’s London Zoo successfully bred the frogs in captivity for the first time, an important step that could help to create a “captive assurance population,” a safety net in case any further dangers hit the only population in the wild.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Getting the frogs to breed thousands of kilometers from their native habitat wasn’t easy. Before conservationists could get the frogs to reproduce, they needed to figure out how to mimic the natural ecosystem of Lake Oku. “We replicated all of the water parameters and temperatures in the lake,” Tapley says. That included water hardness and pH and well as adapting the lighting to the night-and-day patterns on top of sky-high Mount Oku. The zoo also experimented with different foods, again replicating what would be available in Cameroon, which may have served as breeding triggers.

Understanding the frogs’ competitive breeding behavior also helped. For instance, the zoo observed that its two males tried to dislodge one another when each mated with a female. Keeping them separated improved the odds of successful mating.

Tapley thinks the optimized water conditions didn’t make much of a difference to the adult frogs but they did help the eggs and resulting tadpoles. “The tadpoles seemed more receptive and did much better in the system that replicated the lake,” he says. A total of 13 tadpoles have now metamorphosed into juvenile frogs at the zoo.

London Zoo plans to share its results with conservation teams in Cameroon and in other zoos in hopes of increasing the captive assurance population. It’s a necessary step because the deadly amphibian-killing chytrid fungus has recently been observed on the frogs in Lake Oku. It hasn’t killed any of them yet but it’s too early to say if it will be a problem in the future. “Some species are more susceptible to the disease than others and we currently do not know if the Bd infection is an issue with this species,” Tapley says.

Photos by Ben Tapley, courtesy of ZSL London Zoo

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe