Dammed if they don't: Cost to protect endangered sturgeon in South Carolina could be $100 million, utility says

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


How much will it cost to protect an endangered fish in South Carolina? The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) wants local utility Santee Cooper to make several changes to its dams on Marion and Moultrie lakes, which would help endangered shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) to pass through the dams and breed. But Santee Cooper says the changes NMFS wants will cost more than $100 million.

This all comes up as Santee Cooper's license to operate the hydropower dams, which were built in the 1940s, are up for renewal.

NMFS is asking for a few specific changes to the dams to help sturgeon move from the lakes to the fast-moving river areas where they would spawn. The agency wants the flow of water to be increased from 17 to 65 cubic meters per second during spawning season so the sturgeon can more easily pass through the structures. The agency also wants fish ladders or other passage devices installed within the next five years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How important are these changes? In a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates the dams, the NMFS wrote, "We have determined the proposed action [to continue operating the Santee Cooper dams] is likely to appreciably reduce the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of the shortnose sturgeon in the wild," according to The State.

Shortnose sturgeon can be found throughout the eastern U.S., although their numbers are low wherever they occur. The species's population was devastated in the first half of the 20th century by overharvesting for caviar, pollution and, in the Southeast, dams which limited the fish's access to breeding sites. They were listed as endangered in 1967 under the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966, the precursor to the modern Endangered Species Act enacted in 1973.

Photo: Shortnose sturgeon, via Wikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe