Deforestation may have killed off rare bat in Ireland

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Emerald Isle used to be home to 10 bat species. Now there appear to only be nine. Brandt's bat, a species not identified by science until 1970 and not seen in Ireland since 2003, has been declared probably extinct in that country by researchers at the Center for Irish Bat Research (CIBR), a research partnership between University College Dublin (U.C.D.) and Queen's University Belfast, which spent the past two years looking for the animal.

Brandt's bat still exists in nearby England, Europe and throughout Asia, but its disappearance from the Irish countryside presents a cautionary tale about that country's bats and the fate of these animals around the world.

Brandt's bat escaped scientific classification for a long time because they look almost identical to another species, the whiskered bat (M. mystacinus). But the two are completely different genetically, U.C.D. researcher Daniel Buckley said in a prepared release.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because of this morphological similarity, 2003 was both the first and last time that Brandt's bats were officially identified in Ireland. To determine the true population of both the Brandt's and whiskered bats, CIBR researchers set out to examine all known whiskered bat roosts and identify new ones. DNA analysis was then used to see if the whiskered population had been overestimated and the Brandt's population had been underestimated.

But instead of finding more Brandt's bats, the research team only found whiskered bats. Not a single M. brandtii was found. The research will be published this month in the journal Acta Chiropterologica.

"Our conclusions on updating the status of this species in Ireland were that either this specimen was vagrant to the island [of Ireland] or that this species is very rare and possibly endangered," says the CIBR's Emma Boston, a postdoctoral research assistant at U.C.D.

So if the Brandt's bat had been present all along, what killed it off? Boston points to the historic deforestation of Ireland (pdf), which eliminated more than 99 percent of the country's woodland cover by the end of the 19th century. "In Ireland, we are suggesting, not a recent extinction but an historical population decline," Boston says. "We suggest it is likely that a woodland bat species, such as the Brandt's bat, may have once been more abundant in Ireland, but as a result of woodland clearance, and thus loss of foraging habitat and roosting opportunities, are now extremely rare." In fact, she theorizes that Ireland may have lost other bat species in the past century before they were even classified andcounted.

Boston says that one way to continue research into Ireland's historic bat biodiversity is to examine ancientbat bones found deep in the country's caves.

The CIBR team now plans further surveys to try to prove once and for all if the Brandt's bat still exists in Ireland, if it ever did at all.

Photo viaWikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe