Delisted and in danger: Gulf oil spill threatens brown pelicans months after they are dropped from endangered species list

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Images of oil-caked brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) have hit the front pages of countless U.S. newspapers and other media in the past week, driving home the still-growing impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. So far, dozens of pelicans have been transported to rescue centers for treatment. The number is only expected to rise as the oil spill spreads and covers Louisiana's Queen Bess Island Pelican Rookery and other important breeding sites.

It is quite a blow for a species that was on the endangered species list until just six months ago. It had taken brown pelicans nearly 50 years to recover from the devastating effects of DDT and other pesticides that nearly wiped them out. In fact, the species was nonextant in Louisiana and had to be reintroduced to the area from a colony in Florida. Queen Bess Island, one of the primary breeding sites responsible for the resurgence of the birds, had to be stabilized after oil companies nearly destroyed the local wetlands so they could lay pipes.

So far, almost all of the oil-covered pelicans that have been treated have survived, something that would not have been possible without human assistance, a veterinarian with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told The New York Times.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Crude oil like that present in the Gulf is particularly dangerous to birds. It coats their feathers and hardens, making it impossible for them to fly or even move. It also interferes with their ability to regulate their internal temperatures, leaving them susceptible to overheating and dehydration. It can poison the fish they eat, and the oil's toxins seep through the eggshells of pregnant birds, killing their embryos as well.

So far, the oil slick's impact is just starting to harm pelicans, although hundreds of other birds have been found dead. That does not bode well for a species we have already spent half a century trying to save.

Photo: Treated brown pelican being released back into the wild. U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Nick Ameen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe