What do Elephants and Cocaine Have in Common?

Wildlife products and drugs both fuel massive levels of international crime, according to a new United Nations report

Photo: Carved ivory tusks, seized by law enforcement, prior to destruction in 2013. Gavin Shire, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If “Miami Vice” were remade today, the villains wouldn’t be drug kingpins. They’d be wildlife traffickers.

A massive new report published this week by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) proves what conservationists have been saying for years: smuggling of wildlife products is huge business.

The report—compiled from records of 164,000 seizures related to wildlife crime in 120 countries—details the illegal trade in flora and fauna used to create furniture, fashion items, cosmetics, food and medicine, and jewelry, as well as the rampant smuggling of live animals for the pet trade and entertainment venues.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the most powerful elements of the report comes from its chapter on elephant ivory, which it compares and contrasts to cocaine trafficking. Both crimes involve huge international syndicates, but ivory trafficking often involves enormous shipments, each carrying more than 500 kilograms of tusks, something that drug smugglers would never even try to attempt.

The report also notes that ivory and many other products made from rare and endangered species have become investment items, something that I wrote about last year. This puts a bigger price tag on elephants’ heads than ever before. “Speculation limits the prospects for generalized demand reduction,” the report said, “because the value of the commodity is effectively de-linked from end use demand. Unlike cocaine or heroin, there is an absolute limit on the amount of ivory that can be produced, so there is a danger of a vicious cycle ensuing, where each elephant poached increases scarcity, and thus the incentives for poaching another.”

Of course, ivory is just the tip of the iceberg, and this pricing speculation affects many other species. The full trade in illegal wildlife products affects nearly 7,000 species according to the report, while the trade in millions of additional species is not regulated.

This remains a worldwide problem. The U.S., as many studies have shown, is a major market for illegal wildlife products. So is just about every other country. As UNODC executive director Yury Fedotov said in launching this report, “One of the critical messages to emerge from this research is that wildlife and forest crime is not limited to certain countries or regions. It is not a trade involving exotic goods from foreign lands being shipped to faraway markets.”

This report serves as a call to action to the world governments to do more to address the illegal wildlife trade. Of course, criminals will take advantage of every crack in the system that they can find, but the more of them that we close the better off the world’s wildlife will be in the future.

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe