Good News for One of the World’s Rarest Monkeys

You know that a species is in rough shape when a population increase of just 20 animals is cause for celebration. But that’s the case in northern Vietnam this month, where one of the few remaining groups of critically endangered Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus avunculus) has grown from just 90 individuals in 2006 to between [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You know that a species is in rough shape when a population increase of just 20 animals is cause for celebration. But that's the case in northern Vietnam this month, where one of the few remaining groups of critically endangered Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus avunculus) has grown from just 90 individuals in 2006 to between 108 and 113 today. That's the highest number ever recorded in the Khau Ca Species and Habitat Conservation Area, which now holds about half of the world's population of this rare species. Khau Ca was home to just 30 or 40 of the animals in a decade ago.

Fauna & Flora International (FFI), which surveyed the monkeys with the assistance of local community conservation teams and researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder, says this is a rare case of a critically endangered species in Vietnam reversing its decline. FFI discovered the Khau Ca population in 2002 as well as another small group near the Chinese border in 2008.

Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys were presumed extinct until they were rediscovered in 1989. Today the species, which currently numbers fewer than 250 individuals, can be found in just five fragmented population groups in northeastern Vietnam. It has appeared in every edition of list of the IUCN's "The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates" report (pdf) since 2000. The species remains at risk due to deforestation, illegal hunting and the use of its body parts in traditional medicine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Photo by Nguyen Van Truong, courtesy of Fauna & Flora International

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe