Good News for One of the World’s Rarest Monkeys

You know that a species is in rough shape when a population increase of just 20 animals is cause for celebration. But that’s the case in northern Vietnam this month, where one of the few remaining groups of critically endangered Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus avunculus) has grown from just 90 individuals in 2006 to between [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You know that a species is in rough shape when a population increase of just 20 animals is cause for celebration. But that's the case in northern Vietnam this month, where one of the few remaining groups of critically endangered Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus avunculus) has grown from just 90 individuals in 2006 to between 108 and 113 today. That's the highest number ever recorded in the Khau Ca Species and Habitat Conservation Area, which now holds about half of the world's population of this rare species. Khau Ca was home to just 30 or 40 of the animals in a decade ago.

Fauna & Flora International (FFI), which surveyed the monkeys with the assistance of local community conservation teams and researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder, says this is a rare case of a critically endangered species in Vietnam reversing its decline. FFI discovered the Khau Ca population in 2002 as well as another small group near the Chinese border in 2008.

Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys were presumed extinct until they were rediscovered in 1989. Today the species, which currently numbers fewer than 250 individuals, can be found in just five fragmented population groups in northeastern Vietnam. It has appeared in every edition of list of the IUCN's "The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates" report (pdf) since 2000. The species remains at risk due to deforestation, illegal hunting and the use of its body parts in traditional medicine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Photo by Nguyen Van Truong, courtesy of Fauna & Flora International

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe