Lessons learned from a beloved blue butterfly's resurgence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Thirty years ago, the large blue butterfly (Maculinea arion) disappeared from England, the victim of over-eager collectors and habitat degradation. But today the species is thriving in the UK, and boasts more colonies than before its populations started declining in the 1950s.


What made the restoration of the large blue butterfly a success? Much of the credit goes to Jeremy Thomas of the University of Oxford and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Wallingford.


Before the large blue vanished, Thomas spent years studying their last remaining colony in the UK. "From May to late September, I was living with the last UK colony, measuring everything, including their behavior, how many eggs they laid, the survival of individual eggs, how many caterpillars were in the plants. It was a bit like a detective story," Thomas said in a statement.


What he discovered laid the groundwork for the successful reintroduction of the species. The story will finally be told this week in the journal Science, and it may offer lessons to help save other at-risk species.


It turns out that, like many butterflies, the large blue tricks local ants into rearing its young caterpillars. But unlike other species, the large blue relies upon a specific red ant, Myrmica sabuletiI, for its nanny services. Because of that unique relationship, the butterfly's population started to crash when that ant species declined.


The ants ran into trouble when farmers stopped grazing their livestock as they had for generations and a virus ravaged the population of wild rabbits. Grasses grew too long, causing soil temperatures to drop by a few degrees. That was just cold enough to make the area inhospitable to the ants, and that hurt the butterflies.  “If you're the size of an ant or butterfly that difference is massive," Thomas said.


With this information in hand, Thomas and his colleagues began restoring the large blue's habitat to ideal conditions. Once a few habitats were ready, the reintroduction of butterflies from Sweden began.


It was Thomas's focus on young and juvenile butterflies that made the difference, and his research shows that ecologists can save time and find more clues to saving troubled species by examining the life patterns of their young than a species' entire life cycle.


It's too early to say how much impact this research and its conclusions will have, but with many other locally extinct species -- such as the beaver and red kite -- being reintroduced to the UK, the story of the large blue may soon have a sequel.


Image: Maculinea arion, David Simcox, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK. Used with permission.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe