Lost Butterfly Rediscovered After 56 Years

This critically endangered Brazilian butterfly had only been seen twice before

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In late 2014 the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul added a monkey, a tapir, a weasel-like species called the tayra and 18 butterflies to its red list of endangered species.

One of those butterflies, a metallic-winged species known only as Stichelia pelotensis, was a bit of a mystery. It was first described in the 1950s, but all attempts to find it again in its original location had proven fruitless. The species had only been seen one time since then, a female found 250 kilometers from the first site. With this rarity in mind, the state government declared the butterfly critically endangered and warned that it faced extinction due to ongoing habitat loss in the region where it had first been seen.

A year later, we have good news about that lost butterfly. According to research published Nov. 28 in the journal Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, S. pelotensis has finally been found.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers from Universidade Federal do Paraná and two other Brazilian institutions found the butterfly in a marshy grassland habitat about 17 kilometers from where it was observed in the 1950s. Their first sighting consisted of a single male. They had to wait nearly two months for their next observation, but patience paid off. This time they saw four additional males. A week later they saw both a male and a female.

As recounted in their paper, the male and female were seen feeding on a flowering plant called Eryngium elegans. “After feeding,” they wrote, “both specimens flew away in a rapid and erratic flight and were not seen again.”

Lead author Ricardo Russo Siewert, a biologist with Universidade Federal do Paraná, calls this “an important find” but says this is just the first step toward understanding this rarely seen species. We don’t know much about its behavior or ecological needs, including the host plant on which it lays its eggs. We don’t know how well the butterflies are doing, how many of them, or if they exist in other locations. “We still need to perform well-optimized inventories to search for other populations of this species,” he said.

Time is of the essence there. Siewert notes that “only 0.14 percent of these grasslands habitats in Rio Grande do Sul state is represented in preserved areas.” That tiny percentage doesn’t include the habitat where the butterfly was found. “The remaining field (or campos) habitats are losing area by the expansion of agricultural and silvicultural [forest crop] activities,” he says.

For now, Siewert considers this once-lost butterfly to still be critically endangered and in need of conservation. But at least the mystery of its existence has for now been solved.

Photo courtesy of Gustavo Crizel Gomes

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe