Microjewels: Stunningly Beautiful Snails Going Extinct As Soon As They Are Discovered

You need to have pretty good eyesight to see the tiny snails from the genus Plectostoma. These almost impossibly small gastropods from Malaysia and Thailand only reach a millimeter or two in width, but they make up for their lack of size with their stunning beauty.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You need to have pretty good eyesight to see the tiny snails from the genus Plectostoma. These almost impossibly small gastropods from Malaysia and Thailand only reach a millimeter or two in width, but they make up for their lack of size with their stunning beauty. The 31 Plectostoma species described in a new paper published this week in ZooKeys all feature shells that twist and whorl into amazing, complex shapes. Their shells are also so thin that they practically glow in the sunlight. The snails—10 of which are new to science and many of which are endangered—have been called "microjewels" by Dutch Ph.D. student Thor-Seng Liew for their ornate coils and ornamentations.

Unfortunately, these tiny snails live in very small microhabitats which are quickly disappearing. As Liew and his co-authors describe in the paper, the snails live only on limestone hills, which are not only relatively rare in Southeast Asia but have also been actively mined as a source of raw materials for concrete. Most of these species have habitats limited to individual limestone hills, making them particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and extinction.

In fact, the paper reports that one species, P. sciaphilum, which was first discovered in 1952, is now extinct. Its only habitat was quarried away in 2003. The authors warn that another species, P. tenggekensis, described by science for this first time in this paper, also faces the threat of ongoing quarrying and might not last until the end of this year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All told, six of the 31 species described in the paper are critically endangered. One is endangered, while the authors warn that three more should be considered vulnerable to extinction. (These assessments have not yet been added to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.)

The 107-page paper describing these snails is itself pretty amazing. It elevates the previously known snails from what had earlier been described as a subgenus, Opisthostoma, to the full genus of Plectostoma. The taxonomies of the 21 species that had previously been described have all been revised and the 10 new species have full descriptions, complete with 3D models of their shells developed through computerized X-ray tomography (better known as CT scans) and DNA barcodes for each species.

By the way, this is the first of two papers on these microjewels. A second, as yet unscheduled, will describe another batch of Plectostoma species living in Sumatra. I guess it takes a massive amount of research to describe even the tiniest of species.

Photographs by Thor-Seng Liew. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe