Nationwide search leads to rediscovery of 5 frog species in India

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Five "lost" frog species, including one not observed by science in the past 136 years, have been rediscovered in India.

These finds are the result of the Lost! Amphibians of India project, a yearlong attempt to locate 50 frog species that have not been seen in India for many decades. Several of these species are thought to possibly be extinct or are so rare that little data exists about them.

"This find is an important one," says University of Delhi associate professor and project coordinator Sathyabhama Biju. "If we need to conserve these species, we have to first find them. I believe this rediscovery is an important step forward in the conservation of Indian amphibians."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The rediscovered species include the chalazodes bubble-nest frog (Raorchestes chalazodes), last seen in India in 1874; the anamalai dot-frog (Ramanella anamalaiensis), last seen in 1937; the Dehradun Stream frog (Amolops chakrataensis), for which only one specimen, found in 1985, has previously been seen; the Silent Valley tropical frog (Micrixalus thampii), last seen 30 years ago; and the elegant tropical frog (Micrixalus elegans), only described by scientists once back in 1937. This last species's only known habitat is threatened by a proposed hydroelectric project.

Biju reports that three of the five species live in highly degraded habitats and remain at risk of extinction. Habitat loss from human development remains the greatest threat to India's amphibians. "The homes of many endemic amphibians are under great pressure," Biju says. "Many of these areas have already disappeared. If we need to conserve amphibians we need to conserve their habitats."

Although the project lacks funding, Biju has pulled together 150 volunteers into 15 teams to search the Indian countryside. "It is indeed a very challenging task to coordinate an initiative of this magnitude," he notes.

Biju says he has "guarded confidence" that many of the remaining 45 missing frog species will be rediscovered over the next 10 months. "India has the highest number of lost amphibian species, and the period for which they have been 'lost' is simply incredible—from 18 years to as long as 170 years! We hope that we will be able to find the remaining lost species."

India has 321 known amphibian species, 180 of which inhabit no other country.

Photo: The rediscovered chalazodes bubble-nest frog (Raorchestes chalazodes), last seen in 1874. Courtesy of S. D. Biju

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe