Natural Gas Company Fined $500,000 for Damaging Endangered Species Habitat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A subsidiary of Petrohawk Energy Corp. has been fined $350,000 and ordered to pay an additional $150,000 in restitution for damaging the habitat of an endangered species in Arkansas. The latter amount will be paid to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for use in watershed restoration projects in the area, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office.

The damage was caused in three forks of the Little Red River, home to the critically endangered speckled pocketbook mussel (Lampsilis streckeri). It is unknown exactly how many of the freshwater mussels were affected by the damage to their habitat.

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), the upper Little Red River in the Ozark Mountains is the only habitat of the rare bivalve.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Petrohawk subsidiary Hawk Field Services, LLC, pleaded guilty to three counts of violating the Endangered Species Act on April 8. Sentencing took place on September 14.

"This sentence should serve notice to all companies who would threaten our natural resources that we will prosecute those who carelessly conduct business to the detriment of our state's resources," U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas Christopher R. Thyer said in the prepared statement. He noted the health of the speckled pocketbook mussel is an important indicator of the water quality in the Little Red River, because it depends on clean water.

According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Hawk Field Services did not adequately control erosion during the construction of a natural gas pipeline in the nearby Fayetteville Shale, allowing silt to run downhill into the river, where it built up as sediment, affecting water quality in the mussels' habitat. The construction project lasted from October 2008 to April 2009.

Petrohawk sold its natural gas assets in the Fayetteville Shale to a subsidiary of ExxonMobil in 2010. Petrohawk itself was recently acquired by Australia's BHP Brilliton, Ltd. None of the companies have released a statement about the case or the fine.

Photo by Chad Cooper via Flickr. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe