Another Challenge for Orangutan Conservation: Food

As the red apes get squeezed out of their habitats, a new study finds that not just any new forest will do

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Throughout the Indonesian island of Borneo, orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) are getting squeezed out of their forest habitats by the voracious palm oil industry. Farmers frequently chop or burn down native forests in order to replace them with lucrative and often illegal plantations. This forces any of the arboreal apes that survive the assault—most don’t—to attempt moving to new territories, either on their own or with the assistance of orangutan conservation groups.

But not just any new territory will do. A study published October 14 in PLoS One finds that orangutans depend on very high-calorie foods for their survival. That means that any new habitats the apes colonize will need to have ready food supplies, something that may not be available in all locations.

The study, by researchers from Rutgers University in New Jersey and six other institutions, examined two of Borneo’s healthiest orangutan populations . The research, conducted from 2003 to 2010, found that each population’s habitat contains a different makeup of available food, one of which was far less than ideal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Both populations live in what are known as peat forests, tropical areas with leafy, waterlogged soil that prevents local trees from absorbing much nutrition through the ground. The first population lives in the Sabangau Forest, a very typical peat environment where the peat is up to four meters deep. The second population lives 63 kilometers away in the Tuanan forest where the peat is much shallower (one to two meters deep) and the trees receive additional nutrients from seasonal river floods.

The qualities of the Tuanan forest had two important effects: not only was there more food, there were also more orangutans. The Tuanan apes live at a population density of between 4.3 and 4.5 individuals per square kilometer, compared to 2.3 apes per square kilometer in Sabangau.

In addition to more fruit and other food in Tuanan, the composition of all plants differed. In Tuanan, orangutan diets were higher in lipids and non-structural carbohydrates, which provided them with more energy. The apes in Sabangau had a diet higher in fiber, which did not.

All told, the Tuanan apes were able to consume as much as 2,500 more calories per day while spending less time searching for food. That’s energy they could put into breeding. Sabangau orangutans consumed fewer calories but expended more energy trying to fill their bellies, leaving little for anything else.

Lead author Erin Vogel, an evolutionary anthropologist at Rutgers, said in a prepared statement that the study shows how environment can affect large, arboreal animals. “If animals can't obtain enough energy, reproductive output and population sizes will suffer.”

This is especially important since conservation groups are trying to get the Indonesian government and palm oil companies to set aside new habitats for orangutans on both Borneo and Sumatra (the Sumatran apes are a separate species, P. abelii, but they’re similar enough to the Borneon orangutans, P. pygmaeus, that this study can apply to them both). The areas could serve as new homes for apes that would be relocated away from the palm-oil industry or those who already live in sanctuaries while they await safe new homes. Choosing those new sites for their food content, according to the researchers, will be critical. “If you want to increase the populations of this endangered species, you need to make sure that they are being reintroduced into suitable habitats,” Vogel said. “It means looking at forests carefully, making sure they are productive, and that there is enough food to eat in terms of caloric gain.”

Of course, there’s already a major wrinkle in all of this. Borneo and Sumatra are currently plagued by thousands of intentionally set forest fires caused by slash-and-burn agriculture. Conservation groups tell me that some of these fires are burning in or near important orangutan habitats, including Sabangau. Not only does this endanger the wild apes, the fires are also quickly eliminating any new habitat that into which they could be relocated.

Indonesian officials this week said they have little hope of putting the fires out before this November’s rainy season. Similarly, orangutans in the wild have increasingly little hope of having any forest left in which to live as the next few years carve out yet more of their habitat.

Photo by Budi Nusyirwan. Used under Creative Commons license

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe