Polar Rare: The Arctic's apex predator could disappear from Hudson Bay in 10 years

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Canada's western Hudson Bay could lose its population of polar bears(Ursus maritimus) in as little as a decade, according to new research by biologist Andrew Derocher and others from the University of Alberta (U.A.).

Derocher tells Yale Environment 360 that the polar bears in western Hudson Bay have lost 25 percent of their population in the past three decades. During that time, the animals' average body weight has dropped by 27 kilograms and females have lost 10 percent of their body length.

Much, if not all, of this has been caused by the loss of sea ice in the region. Polar bears rely on this ice for hunting and rearing their young. Hudson Bay polar bears now spend three more weeks on land than they did three decades ago, for a total of nearly five months, during which time they are unable to hunt, burning off two pounds of fat per day.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to calculations by Derocher and his team, led by U.A. mathematical biologist Peter Molnar, the western Hudson Bay polar bears could die out in 25 to 30 years, or maybe in as few as 10 if there are several years in a row with low sea-ice conditions. "One of the things we found was that the changes in this population could happen very dramatically," Derocher said. "And a lot of the change could come within a single year if you just ended up with an earlier melt of sea ice."

Globally, there are 19 populations of polar bears. The population in Hudson Bay is one of the most accessible by humans, and has therefore been studied more heavily than most.

Photo: Polar bear, via Wikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe