Rare discovery indicates hope for Yangtze alligators

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Just 120 Yangtze alligators (Alligator sinensis) remain in the wild in China, making them the world's most endangered crocodilian species.

But now field researchers have higher hopes for the survival of the species, after finding that it is not only extending its habitat but also successfully breeding. The survey team found alligator tracks in areas where the species has not been found for many years, and "We have for the first time found wild baby alligators," Wang Chaolin, deputy director of the Chinese Alligators Protection Nature Reserve in east China's Anhui Province, told China's Xinhua news service this weekend. "Normally their survival rate is only 2 percent. The finding of the infants indicates the number of the species is increasing."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Previous research conducted by the Wildlife Conservation Society found that Chinese alligators in 2002 were declining at a rate of 4 percent to 6 percent a year, thanks in no small part to a widely dispersed population with no groups larger than 10 alligators.

China was home to as many as 3,000 wild alligators as late at the 1960s, according to The People's Daily. The species  decreased rapidly when its habitat was developed by humans, and they died from eating rats that had been poisoned to control vermin populations. By 1980, there were just 500 to 750 alligators left.

China first moved to protect the alligator -- the only species of alligator in the world outside of the U.S. -- in 1979, when conservationists there captured 200 gators and established the Chinese Alligator Breeding Research Center in Anhui. Since that time, the captive population has  exploded to more than 10,000. The captive alligators frequently, and legally, enter the food market, where their meat is believed to cure colds and prevent cancer, according to a May 2008 article in National Geographic.

Wang told Xinhua that this newfound growth can be attributed to the breeding program and the release of a few dozen captive-bred alligators to the wild -- about six a year, even though there are concerns that the 10,000 alligators at the Nature Preserve could face some inbreeding issues due to living in confined areas, although none have yet shown up, according to a recent report from Reuters.

Wang said he now hopes to see the wild population of Yangtze alligators increase to 300 over the next decade.

Image: Alligator sinensis, via Wikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe