Rat eradication program begins in Galapagos Islands

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Galápagos National Park Service has launched a project to protect the famous archipelago's endangered species by wiping out introduced, invasive rats. As has been done in other locations, such as Australia's Christmas Island, the Galápagos rats will be targeted with poison bait dropped from helicopters, starting on nine of the chain's small and medium-sized islands.

The project actually got its start in 2008 with a pilot project on North Seymour Island. The poison there was dispersed by hand. The island has now been reported clear of rats.

According to a report from the Canadian Press, "The poisoned bait is contained in light blue cubes that attract rats but are repulsive for the sea lions and birds that also inhabit the islands."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This time around, pilots will use GPS data to disperse the poisoned bait over the entire surface of the islands. The bait will be applied twice, seven days apart, with the goal of killing all of the rats on the islands during that time. The cost for this phase of the project is estimated at just under $1 million.

Once the rats are gone, a few other introduced species (plants and invertebrates) which have a lesser impact on the Galapagos ecosystems will also be targeted, although the methods of this targeting were not made clear.

According to the Galápagos Conservancy, scientists have performed a risk analysis to make sure that the poisoned bait will not affect the native species. Most of the native species, including mockingjays and Charles Darwin's famous finches, would not be likely to consume the poisoned bait, but one species, the Galápagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis), is considered at risk, because it could "capture and feed on rodents that have consumed the bait," according to a prepared release from the Conservancy. To protect them, 20 of the hawks were captured from two islands and will be held in captivity for two months until neither the poison nor the rats pose a risk to the birds.

Three species of introduced rodents, which came to the islands on boats, can be found throughout the Galapagos, including the black rat (Rattus rattus) and Norway rat (R. norvegicus) and, to a lesser degree, the house mouse. They pose threats to tortoises, iguanas and 50 different land and sea birds by eating the eggs of the animals and by carrying parasites and disease.

Ironically, the extinction of a native Galápagos rodent was caused by black rats more than 75 years ago after the rats brought disease and competition for food and living space, according to the Galápagos National Park web site. The last Santa Cruz mouse (Nesoryzomys indefessus) was captured in 1934. Another rodent species, the Santiago mouse (N. swarthi) disappeared in 1906 and was believed to have gone extinct, but it was rediscovered in 1997.

(Another irony: eliminating cats from one island caused the rat population there to explode. Oops.)

The project's manager, Victor Carrion, said it would take 20 years to fully clear the archipelago of invasive rats.

Photo: Rattus rattus by Alex O'Neal via Flickr, Creative Commons Licensed

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe