The loris: Another primate at risk from traditional Asian medicine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Lorises, tiny nocturnal primates found in southern Asia, are increasingly at risk due to illegal wildlife trade and their use in traditional Asian medicine, a new study finds.

Every year, according to research published in the American Journal of Primatology, thousands of lorises are caught for use in traditional medicine. In countries like Cambodia it is believed that eating loris flesh can treat leprosy. Tonics made from lorises are marketed as a treatment to heal wounds and broken bones or to help women regain strength after childbirth. In Sri Lanka loris body parts are used to ward off the "evil eye" or to cast curses. Loris tears are also an ingredient in love potions.

Lorises are also often caught for the pet trade — despite their toxic bites, which can lead to anaphylactic shock and even death in humans. The study found that most lorises for sale as pets have had their teeth removed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of the nine loris species, two are classified as endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , which also lists all species with declining populations. Trade in eight of the loris species is restricted by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which limits the sale of all six species of slender lorises (from the genus Loris ) and bans trade in two of the three loris species from the genus Nycticebus (the Bengal slow loris, N. bengalensis ,and the pygmy slow loris, N. pygmaeus ).

The primates are also protected by law in Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Indonesia and other countries, although punishments are rare and lax, the study found. In fact, the researchers found lorises openly for sale throughout south and Southeast Asia.

"The open trade in these animals highlights a serious lack in enforcement—laws are ignored by wildlife traders who are obviously not afraid of legal repercussions," said one of the study's authors, Chris Shepherd of TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, in a prepared statement.

Lead author Anna Nekaris of the Nocturnal Primate Research Group at Oxford Brookes University points out another reason why it is so easy to catch and trade these animals: "The tendency to freeze when spotted by humans makes lorises particularly vulnerable."

Photo: Slow loris by Dan Bennett, via Flickr, used under Creative Commons license

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe