Only Three Addax Antelopes Left in the Wild?

A new survey finds this critically endangered species on the knife’s edge of extinction

The last three wild addax? © Thomas Rabeil, courtesy of Sahara Conservation Fund

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Is this the end for the addax (Addax nasomaculatus)? The IUCN reported today that extensive surveys of addax habitat in Niger found just three of these critically endangered antelopes left in the wild. The last animals were located after a 700 kilometer ground search, huddled together in what the IUCN described as a “very nervous” group.

The IUCN could not confirm if they were able to observe the sex of the three antelopes. They also declined to comment on if they think there might be more addax might be out that there that they were not able to count. The survey combined both ground and aerial searches and used infrared cameras and other technology to observe the animals, so it seems unlikely that they would have missed many.

The organization was, however, quite clear on the reason for the recent decline, playing the blame firmly on poaching by soldiers employed to protect Chinese-owned oil installations in Niger. Addax habitat and the surrounding region, the IUCN said, became a hotbed of drug smuggling, weapons trafficking, political insurgency and illegal wildlife trade following Libya’s collapse in 2011. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We are gravely concerned about this unfolding wildlife disaster in the desert,” Dave Mallon, chair of the IUCN Antelope Specialist Group, said in a prepared statement. “This species is simply unable to cope with the current levels of disturbance and illegal killing. Without urgent coordinated action at all levels we will very soon witness its demise.”

Thomas Rabeil of the Sahara Conservation Fund added that the companies with commercial interests in the region, notably China National Petroleum Corporation, should cooperate with wildlife authorities to contribute to addax conservation.

The IUCN is calling for additional efforts to monitor and secure addax in the wild, as well as a broad range of other conservation actions, including rebuilding wild populations with captive-bred animals. A few thousand of the animals live in captivity or semi-wild conditions in zoos, nature reserves, and breeding programs in Africa, Europe, Japan and Australia. Hundreds more can be found on private ranches in in Texas, where, ironically enough, they are legally hunted—which is kind of how the addax got to this terrible situation in the first place.

Related:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe