Thylacine Hunted into Extinction for No Reason, Study Reveals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus), better known as the Tasmanian tiger, has long been the poster child for human-caused extinction. Hunted out of existence by Australian farmers who feared that the striped, canine-like marsupials would kill their sheep, the last thylacine died in captivity in Hobart Zoo 75 years ago next week, on September 7, 1936 (although the species was not officially declared extinct until about 25 years ago).

Now, just a few days before the annual observance of National Thylacine Day in Australia, a new study reveals that the predator was probably not a threat to sheep after all. Its notably long jaw (one of the animal's most distinctive features) could open to an amazing 120 degrees but was too weak to kill sheep, according to a study published September 1 in the Journal of Zoology.

"Our research has shown that its rather feeble jaw restricted it to catching smaller, more agile prey," lead author Marie Attard of the University of New South Wales in Australia, said in a prepared statement. Instead, it appears the thylacine killed and ate smaller animals, such as possums.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers used computer models to simulate normal predator behavior—biting, tearing and pulling—and assess how that behavior would create stress against the skull of the thylacine. The models revealed that the thylacine's skull would not have been up to the task of chowing down on large animals.

But while thylacines may not have been a threat to sheep, humans still posed a threat to thylacines that could have driven the animals closer toward extinction, even without rampant, unnecessary hunting. Since the predators specialized in smaller prey, the arrival of European settlers to the Australian continent may have disturbed the landscape and forced the thylacine into closer proximity and competition with other marsupial predators, such as Tasmanian devils or spotted-tailed quolls, for prey such as bandicoots, wallabies and possums, all of which were also losing habitat to humans and agriculture.

Attard suggests that knowing that thylacines and other predators all relied upon the same food sources helps indicate why the thylacine was more vulnerable to extinction—it could not adapt to eating larger prey.

Even though it has been 75 years since the last thylacine died, many people still believe the animals exist in the remote wilds of Australia. No conclusive evidence has ever been found, although sightings are still commonly reported.

Here's footage of the last known thylacine, and its striking jaw, shot before its death in captivity:

Photo via Wikipedia

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe