Tragedy in New Zealand: Dozens of Critically Endangered Birds Dead, Cause Unknown

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Efforts to save the critically endangered shore plover from extinction in New Zealand have suffered a major setback: nearly 60 of the birds have died due to unknown causes, reducing the world population of the species to just 200.

Shore plovers (also known as shore dotterels or Tuturuatu, Thinornis novaeseelandiae) lived on both of New Zealand's main islands before European settlers introduced cats and rats that nearly eradicated the species during the nineteenth century. Luckily a small population of 130 birds survived 800 kilometers away on one of the country’s smaller islands, South East Island (also known as Rangatira), from which a captive-breeding program began in the 1990s. The New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) has spent the last 20 years establishing small, additional populations on other New Zealand islands, including Portland Island (a.k.a. Waikawa), where the dead birds were found at the end of 2012.

Until this unexpected tragedy the birds on Portland had been doing so well that some of the eggs laid there were being moved to other predator-free islands to fortify additional assurance populations. "This has a huge impact on the viability of the species," DOC team leader for shore plover recovery on Portland Island said earlier this month in a prepared release.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Portland Island is a privately owned sanctuary that to the best of the DOC's knowledge does not contain rats, cats, stoats (a type of weasel) or other bird-killing predators. DOC has now set up cameras and recently brought in dogs capable of sniffing out any stoats, but nothing has turned up. The department is also performing disease screenings and autopsies on the dead birds. At least one previously established island population failed when the birds contracted a disease called avian pox.

The remaining 20 shore plovers on Portland Island are now being closely monitored, while 12 eggs found at the end of last year have been moved to two other wildlife centers for incubation before being released on Mana Island, which should take place in March. Additional populations are also maintained on Rangitoto and Motutapu islands, which the DOC cleared of predators in 2011 before moving 17 plovers there in 2012. Some of the released birds can be seen in this video:

Most of the island reserves are far out to sea, too far from the mainland but close enough that the birds can fly from island to island. Mana Island, however, is just three kilometers from New Zealand's north island and the birds have been known to fly back to the mainland. In 2011 a group of 30 shore plovers flew from Mana Island to a mainland beach near Wellington. They can be seen searching the tide for crustaceans in this video:

The DOC has previously asked anyone sighting shore plovers on the mainland to report them so the department can try to recapture them and remove them to safety.

Photos: An adult shore plover and a chick, courtesy of the New Zealand Department of Conservation

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe