Tuna fishing kills an albatross every 5 minutes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Every time you open a can of tuna, an albatross dies.

Okay, that's not exactly true, but albatrosses and other seabirds are increasingly endangered by commercial tuna fishing, according to a new report from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and BirdLife International. The problem has gotten so bad that albatrosses are killed on fishing lines at a rate of one every five minutes, according to scientists representing the U.K.-based organizations.

The report has been released to coincide with a meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), headquartered in Madrid, which takes place in Brazil this week to discuss fishing quotas for Mediterranean tuna and swordfish.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to RSPB and BirdLife, 37 bird species are highly at risk from commercial ocean fishing. Sixteen of those species are already officially endangered, and six of the most at-risk species are albatrosses. The birds get tangled in longline hooks, which are baited with squid and other tasty morsels. The two organizations state that "for many species, this is their greatest extinction threat."

Albatross expert Cleo Small is attending the ICCAT meeting on behalf of RSPB and BirdLife. "The populations of albatrosses are declining faster in the South Atlantic than any other ocean," she said in a prepared statement. "This situation is needless, because the technology exists to prevent these deaths."

One of these "technologies" is remarkably simple: the tori, or streamer, line. Basically, fishing crews run lines of ribbons from the stern of a vessel, which create a curtain above fishing lines to deter albatrosses from coming into the so-called "danger zone." Other solutions include using heavier weights, dyeing bait blue so birds can't see it in the water, or setting lines at night, when birds are less likely to be awake.

At least one albatross species, the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans), has lost half its population since the 1960s. Small blames the decline on longline fishing. Other species at risk include the Tristan albatross (Diomedea dabbenena) and the Balearic shearwater (Puffinus mauretanicus), both of which are critically endangered.

Related to the albatross issue, ICCAT this week will also be discussing the fate of the critically endangered bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus), a highly prized delicacy that is rapidly being fished into extinction. Expect more news on that front soon.

Image: Wandering albatross, via Wikipedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe