Tunnels and Bridges Could Help Save Koalas from Extinction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Australia is debating whether or not to list koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) as a threatened or endangered species, and one of the ideas for saving them is to build tunnels to help the marsupials cross under roads without being killed by cars and trucks.

We're used to thinking about koalas living in trees, but they spend enough time on the ground that vehicles pose one of the major threats to the species. In the state of Queensland alone, 4,500 koalas were struck and killed by cars between 1997 and 2009.

Roadways are just one of the dangers the animals face as their populations are in dramatic decline. Other threats include drought, forest fires and excessive heat from climate change; deaths from dog and cat attacks; habitat loss and fragmentation; and, as I wrote two years ago, a deadly, AIDS-like retrovirus as well as chlamydiosis infections.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although no firm numbers exist for koala populations across the Australian continent (estimates range from 35,000 to 100,000), the animals have declined as much as 80 percent in areas such as the Gold Coast during the past 10 to 15 years. (On the other hand, they are overpopulated in a few other regions, such as Kangaroo Island, although they never lived on that island before white settlers brought them there a century ago.)

This week, following 10 months of study, Australia's Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications released a list of 19 recommendations to help save the koala. Among them: lowering highway speed limits near koala habitats; building either koala-proof fences, or bridges and the aforementioned tunnels to help the animals cross over or under other roads; controlling the population of wild dogs, which killed at least 954 koalas between 1997 and 2009; identifying key locations for koala conservation; and putting more money into koala research, including the quest for new vaccines. The committee's full report is here.

Environment Minister Tony Burke told the Australian press this week that "koalas are an iconic Australian animal. They hold a special place in the hearts of Australians."

But although the Senate committee also acknowledged the "surprising" level of passion that koalas engender, not everyone in the country is pro-protection. Much as U.S. businesses are saying that protecting the dunes sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus) under the Endangered Species Act would threaten oil jobs, Australian businesses argued to the committee that protecting the koala would cost "tens of thousands" of construction and mining jobs.

Burke said he will make a decision about listing the koala as a threatened species under the nation's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act before the end of 2011.

Photo via Wikipedia. Used under Creative Commons license

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe