Food fears: A social issue?

From high-fructose corn syrup to lean finely textured beef, health or safety concerns about specific food ingredients can capture the public's attention and have the potential to significantly impact the food industry.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


From high-fructose corn syrup to lean finely textured beef, health or safety concerns about specific food ingredients can capture the public’s attention and have the potential to significantly impact the food industry. While some food fears are backed by scientific evidence, a recent study by Cornell University researchers suggests food fears may also have a social ingredient.

The researchers surveyed a sample of 1008 U.S. mothers about a specific ingredient, high-fructose corn syrup, and found that those who avoided the ingredient also were more likely to want their friends to know their opinions about food.

One reason people avoid ingredients may be as a way to create the image that they are a healthy eater, according to Aner Tal, one of the study’s authors who is a post-doctoral research associate in Cornell University’s Food and Brand Lab.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mothers who said they avoided high-fructose corn syrup also scored higher on a scale of social desirability, which measures a person’s tendency to say things they think will gain others’ approval.

But the high-fructose corn syrup avoiders may not always be willing to put their money where their mouth is. The study also found that women who said they avoided high-fructose corn syrup were not willing to pay more for a food item that contained table sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup compared to those participants who did not avoid the ingredient.

Since some food fears are unfounded, the researchers also took a look at what counteracts unnecessary food fears. Rather than a traditional approach of providing consumers with the science behind a food ingredient and its safety, the findings suggest telling consumers about the history of an ingredient and its use in other products can be helpful.

“If you know more background about something, where it comes from, where it’s used, then that makes it seem more familiar,” Tal said.

So while a need for social approval may have the potential to encourage food fears, the food industry may also have a way to fight against those fears they find unjustified.

Julianne Wyrick is a freelance science and health writer currently completing the health and medical journalism graduate program at the University of Georgia. Six years ago she took a chemistry class from a former food scientist, and she's been fascinated by the science of food ever since. She has a bachelor's degree in biochemistry from Asbury University and has interned as a science writer at Fermilab and Alltech, an animal health and nutrition company. While completing her master's, she currently writes about science for UGA's Office of Research Communications. She's also recently written about science and health for Symmetry magazine and Georgia Health News. Find her on the web at juliannewyrick.com or on Twitter @juliannewyrick.

More by Julianne Wyrick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe