Naming Nootkatone

I’ve always enjoyed the citrusy, dark, mellow-but-tangy notes emanating from a freshly-cut grapefruit. Some of that flavor comes from(+)-nootkatone, a terpene fragrance that, as a recentNature News article points out, will be one of the first fine chemicalsproduced using the relatively new technique of synthetic biology.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I've always enjoyed the citrusy, dark, mellow-but-tangy notes emanating from a freshly-cut grapefruit. Some of that flavor comes from (+)-nootkatone, a terpene fragrance that, as a recent Nature Newsarticle points out, will be one of the first fine chemicals produced using the relatively new technique of synthetic biology. Economic and cultural issues still swirl around this development, but I have a much simpler question:

How do you say nootkatone?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hear me out - I've searched video clips, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) WebBook, collections of "funny-named" molecules, the Merck Index, and even consulted the IPA charts. The etymology's confusing - to me, at first blush it appears to be a Greek root, like nootropics (neuroenhancers), which one pronounces "NOH-uh-tropics."

But "Nootka" isn't derived from Greek. For this molecule, we rely upon an Anglicization of a native tongue: in this case, the Nuu-chah-nulth people of modern-day coastal Canada. The phoneme crops up again in Nootka Sound and Nootka Island, both in the Pacific Northwest, as well as the scientific name for the yellow cedar, Chamaecyparis nootkatensis, which this UConn horticultural site pronounces "noo-kah-TEN-sis."

A 2011 NPR story on alternative mosquito repellents has reporter Richard Knox proclaiming the benefits of "NOOT-kah-tone," while a brief survey of YouTube vacation videos and fishing trips to "NUT-ka" Island confuse the issue further. For such a useful and widely-produced molecule, there must be a definitive way to pronounce the name.

noo-kah-TONE? (like the plant)

NOOT-kah-tone? (NPR)

NOH-uh-kah-tone? (like Greek)

NUT-kah-tone? (like YouTube)

Help me out: Who knows the right way to name nootkatone?

See Arr Oh is a medicinal chemist working in industry. See Arr Oh blogs at Just Like Cooking and contributes to several other blogs, including Chemjobber, Totally Synthetic, and CENtral Science's The Haystack and Newscripts

More by See Arr Oh

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe