Pure chocolate

Food traceability ­— the ability to follow a product from farm to store or restaurant — took center stage last February after DNA tests conducted by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland found horse meat in foods advertised to contain beef.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Food traceability ­— the ability to follow a product from farm to store or restaurant — took center stage last February after DNA tests conducted by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland found horse meat in foods advertised to contain beef.

But DNA technology for traceability isn’t limited to meat. Last week, scientists announced the development of a tool that might help ensure the authenticity of a sweeter product of the food industry: chocolate.

The basis of chocolate is the cacao bean. After being harvested from cacao trees, the bean is fermented and dried before being sold to traders and chocolate makers. However, beans from different varieties of the plant may get purposefully or accidentally mixed during this process, meaning that premium chocolate makers can’t be sure they’re buying high-quality “premium” beans over lower-quality beans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dapeng Zhang of the Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service and his colleagues developed a way to tell the difference between a premium variety of beans and a more common “bulk” variety using small variations in the plants’ DNA called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). By looking at 48 of these variations, the researchers created DNA “fingerprints” for each variety. They used the fingerprints to differentiate between bean samples of a premium variety grown in Peru and a common variety from the same region. The study was published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Scientists already knew how to use SNPs to identify the variety of a cacao tree from leaf samples. What didn’t exist was a way to identify the variety of the bean using the SNPs. The researchers found they could do this by taking DNA from the seed coat surrounding the bean.

The technology is still in the early stages of development, however. A larger database of cocoa bean DNA fingerprints will be needed to determine the purity of various bean samples from around the world.

The researchers think that producers, chocolate makers and consumers could benefit from the increased traceability of premium chocolate.

“[The test] could be done before the chocolate maker actually buys the beans so he could authenticate that they are what he’s paying for,” said Lyndel Meinhardt, a co-author of the study and research leader of the Sustainable Perennial Crops lab at the Agricultural Research Service.

The tool could aid producers and chocolate makers who want to market their product as authentic and unadulterated. If widely applied, such testing might one day help interested consumers make more informed choices.

Now I can’t help but wonder — where were the beans in my favorite dark chocolate bars grown?

Julianne Wyrick is a freelance science and health writer currently completing the health and medical journalism graduate program at the University of Georgia. Six years ago she took a chemistry class from a former food scientist, and she's been fascinated by the science of food ever since. She has a bachelor's degree in biochemistry from Asbury University and has interned as a science writer at Fermilab and Alltech, an animal health and nutrition company. While completing her master's, she currently writes about science for UGA's Office of Research Communications. She's also recently written about science and health for Symmetry magazine and Georgia Health News. Find her on the web at juliannewyrick.com or on Twitter @juliannewyrick.

More by Julianne Wyrick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe