Science, technology and the chef

Chef Richie Farina is no stranger to scientific technology, yet he also has an eye for art. He's executive chef of the Chicago molecular gastronomy eatery, Moto, which means he often uses high-tech scientific equipment and processes in making his dishes.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Chef Richie Farina is no stranger to scientific technology, yet he also has an eye for art. He’s executive chef of the Chicago molecular gastronomy eatery, Moto, which means he often uses high-tech scientific equipment and processes in making his dishes. But Farina employs these techniques for purposes beyond the “wow” factor, as he explains to Kelly Hensel in an interview for her Food Technologycolumn “Culinary Point of View.”

“Right now a lot of stuff I am doing is taking the ‘science-y’ molecular ends and using them as tools to make the dish look more natural,” Farina explains in the column.

He cites Moto’s wild boar dish as an example. In this dish, he uses the food ingredient maltodextrin to absorb fat and create a powder that looks like soil, reminiscent of the dish’s natural roots.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“His whole goal … is to use these awesome scientific techniques that can take food to this next level, but use them in a way that reminds people ... where this food originally came from,” Hensel told me later.

The marriage of food science and the culinary arts is a growing trend, according to Hensel. Bridging the gap between these two worlds is one of the reasons the Food Technology senior digital editor started her monthly “Culinary Point of View” column last July. The column is part of Food Technology magazine, a publication geared at members of the Institute of Food Technologists. The organization’s members use the science behind food to understand everything from why people select certain foods to improving food packaging.

“A lot of our members are saying they’re either hiring a chef on staff or they’re consulting out with chefs to get that [culinary] insight,” Hensel said. One of her columns picks the brain of research and development chef Andrew Hunter, who works with food companies to create products that pair flavor and affordability.

As someone interested in the science of cooking, I found the culinary viewpoint in Hensel's columns to be interesting. It doesn’t hurt that each chef provides a recipe – for Farina, it’s Moto’s strawberries and cream.

 

Julianne Wyrick is a freelance science and health writer currently completing the health and medical journalism graduate program at the University of Georgia. Six years ago she took a chemistry class from a former food scientist, and she's been fascinated by the science of food ever since. She has a bachelor's degree in biochemistry from Asbury University and has interned as a science writer at Fermilab and Alltech, an animal health and nutrition company. While completing her master's, she currently writes about science for UGA's Office of Research Communications. She's also recently written about science and health for Symmetry magazine and Georgia Health News. Find her on the web at juliannewyrick.com or on Twitter @juliannewyrick.

More by Julianne Wyrick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe