Science versus Organic Food

An excellent podcast to get you caught up on the science of organic food. Short version: they're not all they're cracked up to be

DAVE PARKER Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
 
 
 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It's possible I listen to more podcasts than is strictly healthy. At present count, I subscribe to 32 - most of these are weekly, but a not-insubstantial portion are daily. For a while, I was being a completest, but since I don't spend as much time doing mindless work at the bench, I've had to start skipping episodes of some shows.

I've got a few favorites (I've listened to every episode of On the Media since about 2005 - it was what started my podcast addiction), but I also occasionally try out new shows to keep it fresh. One recent addition that quickly became must-listen is Science Vs, a show that contends with contentious topics from the standpoint that arguments should be settled by data - a concept I wholly support!

A recent episode is about organic food and, surprise surprise, the science shows it's not all it's cracked up to be. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They address 3 basic questions:

1) Do organic foods taste better?

2) Are organic foods healthier?

3) Are organic foods better for the environment?

The answers? 1) No. 2) No. 3) Ehh... Feel free to listen to get all the details. 

I was a little disappointed that they didn't get into GMOs, though the host, Wendy Zuckerman acknowledges this, and (rightly) suggests that it's just too loaded to get into - hopefully they'll do a standalone episode sometime! (Wendy - if you need someone to chat with on background, feel free to get in touch!). But overall, they do a pretty great job - chatting with farmers, doctors and scientists.

I like learning new things, and I actually learned a fair bit with this episode - and before that they abley tackled gun control and fracking. This is a pretty great start as far as I'm concerned, and a much-needed resource for our public discourse. Plus, the episodes are filled with off-color jokes and terrible (or glorious, depending on your perspective) puns - what more could you want?!

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe