Balance – How to develop a research career and a growing family?

How to find a balance? How to deal with career and kids? Matthias Hagen from Weimar University, Germany, had the idea for this workshop: “Balance – How to develop a research career and a growing family”.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


How to find a balance? How to deal with career and kids? Matthias Hagen from Weimar University, Germany, had the idea for this workshop: “Balance – How to develop a research career and a growing family”.

Avi Widgerson, Nevanlinna Laureate, and about 70 participants attended this. Especially the young researchers have to deal with career, friends and family, time for your own. They are in their ‘rush hour of life’, as Matthias named it. The best contribution to the discussion in my eyes was:

"There are more things you cannot do in your life, than you can. So you have to decide and stay happy. It makes no sense to bother about what you are all missing.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After a short and very well prepared presentation of the problem and its structures by Matthias (see later) a lively debate evoke - mainly circling around having kids and how to organize your life.

 

Avi Widgerson managed to keep the atmosphere relaxed and intimate and told the young researchers about his personal family life: “Often you hear people talk about kids as a constraint. If that’s the only thing that bothers you, you don’t know yet, what having kids brings to you. It is so amazing! …. My wife and me, we did not think about, what a kid means to our career. We just wanted to have a kids.” Widgerson underlined several times, that having kids or not is and stays a very personal decision.

In the discussion I missed a bit the part of the usual question of a good work-life-balance. But at the very end Matthias showed a very simple idea of how to deal with different tasks:

Matthias' scribble

Urgent

Not urgent

Important

A

B

Not-important

C

D

Matthias' favorites are the Ds: "Those I don’t do!”


And here are the main topics of Matthias’ presentation:

Balance for me (Matthias) means four areas

  • Self: Time for you! Activities for you on your own.

  • Partner and Family: Time for your partner, includes partners, parents, siblings, shared experiences

  • Job: Time and dedication to your job. Also includes non-office time where your thoughts are on the job!

  • Friends and Society: Time with other people, involvement in networks, clubs, associations

1. The rush hour of life

  • Central career phase in academia at age 25-40

  • Often only short-term contracts

  • Often intransparent career paths

  • High mobility requirements

  • Part-time possible but with full-time expectations

  • Often strict focus on the job: science as one’s only passion

2. Having small kids

  • Working + childcare difficult

  • Deadlines pressing anyway

  • Supporting networks

3. Women in science – the leaky pipeline

  • Male networks

  • Male attitudes

  • Glass ceiling

  • Lack of role models

4. Beware of the burnout

  • Being overstressed = less concentrated

  • Risk of nootropics misuse (some use new enhancement drugs)

  • Risk of burnout

So, what to do?

Self-management is one key! Define a top-to-do list (see above)

Learn from the more experienced.

 

 

.....

This blog post originates from the official blog of the 1st Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF) which takes place September 22 - 27, 2013 in Heidelberg, Germany. 40 Abel, Fields, and Turing Laureates will gather to meet a select group of 200 young researchers. Beatrice Lugger is a member of the HLF blog team. Please find all her postings on the HLF blog.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe