Dangerous Braids That Tangle in Brains and Veins

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative condition of the brain that is assuming epidemic proportions as the population ages, since it can strike almost anyone.

Sickle Cell Disease is a strictly genetic disorder of African origins that rigidifies red blood cells.

These would seem to be worlds apart in more ways than one.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yet I was reminded this week that one of the delights of science is the discovery of the connections between things that seem totally unrelated: A recent breakthrough in understanding Alzheimer’s, described in the current Early Edition issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences is based on advances my colleagues and I made some 30 years ago in understanding sickle cell.

What these maladies have in common is the association of molecules that were never intended to come together in healthy processes. When the Alzheimer’s molecule, known as amyloid-β, congregates in the brain, it forms the tangles and plaques that are a well-known visual signature found post-mortem in the brains of those who have suffered from the disease.

Those tangles are a type of molecule known as polymers, which are strings of molecules stuck end to end in an intricate but pathological braid.

Sickle cell too has its deadly braided molecules—this time, of the oxygen carrier hemoglobin. These long structures distort cells, but more seriously, stiffen them, and impede their vital passage through the circulation. In both cases, there is a premium on preventing these polymeric strings from initiating.

What turns out to be particularly insidious is that both assemblies can use their surfaces to recruit even more molecules to their pathogenic cause. Called heterogeneous nucleation, the mechanism entails new polymers spontaneously beginning on the surfaces of old one.

It was this discovery, that I made with colleagues James Hofrichter and William Eaton of the National Institutes of Health (published in 1985), that proved to be the Rosetta Stone for understanding sickle hemoglobin polymerization. It explained how so many polymers could form so rapidly, and was a process that was previously unknown in the realm of biological polymerization.

This same idea has now been adapted to the formation of Alzheimer’s polymers by Knowles et al. of Cambridge University. Previous thinking was that those polymers of Aβ somehow snapped, thereby increasing their number. Knowles et al showed by careful experimentation that when solutions were stirred, fibers indeed broke, but as the stirring was progressively reduced, the hidden process of heterogeneous nucleation emerged.

The two diseases, disparate in manifestation, obey the same fundamental rules. This is what Biophysics is all about,the discovery of fundamental physical laws that govern the behavior of diverse biological systems.

Image: adapted from: F. A. Ferrone, J. Hofrichter and W. A. Eaton, 1985, "Kinetics of Sickle Hemoglobin Polymerization II. A Double Nucleation Mechanism", J. Mol. Biol. 183: 611-631

Frank Ferrone is a Professor of Physics and Senior Associate Vice Provost for Research at Drexel University. Trained as a physicist at Manhattan College (BS) and Princeton University (PhD), his interest in Biological Physics began with his doctoral dissertation, and led him to a subsequent postdoctoral Staff Fellowship at the National Institutes of Health. There he began the work with Drs. Hofrichter and Eaton that would unravel the mechanism of sickle cell polymerization. With NIH grant support he has continued exploring various facets of this physically-rich system, and is presently involved in developing diagnostic tools to help describe the state of patients suffering from the disease.

More by Frank Ferrone

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe