October 11, 2016

Girls Can't Do Math or Science?

A music video celebrating the International Day of the Girl destroys that tired old stereotype

Girls doing math in Guinea, West Africa.

LISA EINSTEIN

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

I joined the Peace Corps to teach with the Let Girls Learn initiative for the same reason I studied physics. I wanted to concern myself with fundamental things.

Just as physics forms the foundation for many scientific problems, the denial of education to 62 million girls lies at the root of many of society's problems.

I write to you from a remote village in Guinea, where I am working as a physics educator for 820 seventh-tenth graders, only 198 of whom are girls. And while there are 115 girls in seventh, the eight grade has only 50.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

There are many reasons for these disparities, and I am becoming privy to the subtleties of this complex issue. Take this conversation with a 25-year-old man. With five adolescent female family members listening, he proclaimed, “Girls can’t do math & science, they aren't good at it." We discussed his beliefs in a two hour conversation that left me so fired up, I had to write a song about it. When I shared it with him, he was so convinced by my arguments that he wanted to help spread the message by working with me to record the song. Using candid footage from my time so far in Guinea, I created this video, and am thrilled to share it on the International Day of the Girl.

Let Girls Learn
Let Girls Learn

Posted by Lisa Einstein on Facebook on Monday, October 10, 2016

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American