More Science Films, Please! U.S.C. Science Film Competition...and Others

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It’s not easy to make a film that’s fun, appealing, and....well...educational. Starting with early Horizon series and the NOVA in the 60’s and 70’s, science has borrowed from the cinematic arts to help us all appreciate the beauty of nature and thrill of scientific discovery. (Check out this video of some earlier yet more rudimentary science film efforts.)

Now that HD video cameras are hand-held and film-editing software is widely accessible, anyone can make a science film. But, not everyone can make a good one.

Hence, the recent proliferation of science film competitions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A few weeks ago, I attended the winner’s screening for the USC’s new Science Film Competition, brainchild of professor Clifford Johnson, who you may recognize from numerous episodes of the History Channel’s The Universe series. At any given time, you can find Johnson going off about how hard it is to make a science film that is both entertaining and accurate but how important it is to try. “Good science communication is important to our democracy, otherwise we find that citizens are not well informed enough to make good decisions,” he said on this particular night, just before playing the winning films.

The idea was: one concept, 10 minutes. It must have seemed like a simple task, but many students didn’t finish in the allotted 4-6 months. Science students had to hook up with illustrators and cinema students to make it happen. The ones who worked their butts off entered the running for $2500 first prize, $1500 second prize, and $500 third prize, funded by the Anton Burg Foundation.

Here’s the second and third place entries, followed by a few honorable mentions (1st place could not be posted because of copyright issues):

Check out other science film competitions:

Imagine Science Film Festival

SCINEMA Festival

NPL Science Film Challenge

How Science Works Film and Video Competition

Reel Science Film Festival

UCL Brains on Film

USC Science Film Competition

Sigma Xi Student Short Science film competition

Science Film Festival, Manila

National Science Film Festival, India

 

Casey Rentz is a microbiologist-turned-science journalist living and working in Los Angeles. She freelances for Web, radio, and print. Also, she consults in the communications department of the nonprofit Informed by Nature, writes and illustrates a zine called The Green Box, concocts epic performance art projects, and paints abstract expressionist style works. Casey blogs at Natural Selections and tweets at @caseyrentz.

More by Casey Rentz

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe