Psssstt!!! Gossip and the Link to Your Vision

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Gossip can be juicy, but can it also be useful? The unwritten rules of society imply that gossip should be avoided and dismissed as an unnecessary distraction. However, a recent study at Northeastern University has shown that our subconscious values gossip and that our eyes and mind pay particular attention to negative gossip. It seems our visual system and brain select for information that may help protect you from a potentially dangerous person who could cause you or others harm in the long run. Think of it as your mind capturing a mental mugshot of someone who has done something terrible in the past (or so you’ve heard.)

Participants in this study were simultaneously shown a different image to each of their eyes using a mirror stereoscope. One of their eyes was shown an image of a house, while, at the same time, the other eye was shown an image of a human face. Each eye seeing a different image creates binocular rivalry and the brain ends up having to choose which image to pay the most attention to and it temporarily ignores or suppresses the other eye’s input. Before the participants were shown these pictures they were told something about the person in each image. They were either told a positive, neutral or negative statement and the subject matter of the statement was also social or non-social. For example, “he threw a chair at his classmate” would be a negative, social statement, while “she drew the curtains in the room” would be a neutral, non-social statement.

Participants were then asked to indicate what they were seeing (the house or the face) and for how long (the brain and the eyes may switch back and forth between the two images while deciding on which one will take over their visual consciousness). They discovered that participants reported their eyes (and brain) saw the image of a person’s face for the longest period of time when it was associated with a negative, social gossip. When the person’s face was paired with positive or neutral gossip, it wasn’t seen for as long. Also, even when a person’s face was paired with negative information, such as ‘he had a root canal,’ since the information wasn’t social in nature, it did not significantly dominate the visual consciousness as long as a negative, social tidbit of gossip did. This led researchers to believe that negative, social gossip may trigger some sort of protective mechanism inside of us. If we focus on the face longer knowing that it is a ‘bad guy,’ we may be creating a mental note to watch out for that person in the future or that we may be put on alert, trying to study and gather more information about that person.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Have you ever heard someone say that after they ‘found out something’ about someone else, they ‘never looked at’ that person the same way again? This may explain part of the reason why. Our eyes and our brain may be actively compiling a visual rolodex of “who is friend and who is foe.”

Interesting stuff, and it gives new meaning to the phrase, ‘watch out for that guy.’

[Editor's note: An earlier version of this article appeared on the author's blog.]

References:

Anderson E, Siegel EH, Bliss-Moreau E, & Barrett LF (2011). The visual impact of gossip. Science, 2011 June 17; 332 (6036): 1446-8. Epub 2011 May 19. PMCID:

PMC3141574 DOI: 10.1126/science.1201574

 

Photo credits: stock.xchng photo©[Israel Papillon/ispap] (the secret); stock.xchng photo©[Sonja Mildner/sauerkraut] (Portrait man leering); Gotcha! by Erica© [Erica Angiolillo] (author’s pic)

About Cheryl Murphy

Cheryl G. Murphy is an optometrist whose passion for vision science and the eye began as an research assistant in undergraduate school at SUNY Albany where she studied the development of the visual cortex in the brain. She then attended SUNY College of Optometry where she again assisted in vision research, this time on chromatic aberration and its effect on accommodation of the eye. She attained her bachelor of science degree in biology from SUNY Albany in 2000 and her O.D. degree from SUNY Optometry in Manhattan in 2004. Dr. Murphy began blogging about eye health and the science of sight in 2008 and now enjoys science writing in her free time. She practices optometry on Long Island, N.Y., where she resides with her husband and 4-year-old triplets. Follow her on Twitter @murphyod or on Facebook.

More by Cheryl Murphy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe