The Thrill of Pure Thought and Abstraction

This is a part of a series of Q&As with mathematicians and computer scientists participating at the 1st Heidelberg Laureate Forum, September 22-27, 2013.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This is a part of a series of Q&As with mathematicians and computer scientists participating at the 1st Heidelberg Laureate Forum, September 22-27, 2013. More than 40 Laureates (Abel Prize, Fields Medal, Nevanlinna Prize, Turing Award) will attend the forum together with 200 young researchers. For a full week Heidelberg in Germany will be the hot spot of mathematics and computer science. Six of the young scientists told us about their current research and their expectations before the meeting.

Meet Franziska Jahnke in this short Q&A series with 6 out of 200 young researchers:

Name?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Franziska Jahnke

Nationality?

German

Where are you based?

WWU Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-University), Germany

What is your current position?

Research assistant (post-doc position - or in German: “Akademische Rätin auf Zeit”)

What is the focus of your research?

My research area is model theory, with applications in and connections to number theory. More specifically, I study the theories of fields (one might say their arithmetic) using tools from Galois theory and valuation theory.

Why did you become a mathematician?

I liked maths at school and even then enjoyed maths puzzles and competitions, thus it seemed a natural choice to study maths at university. I still remember my first lecture in linear algebra: the thrill of pure thought and abstraction, represented to me then by the definition of a ring, has never let go of me since. Soon I realized, few things compare to the satisfaction and excitement of having a mathematical insight or drawing a connection. However, there are even more perks: Being a mathematician also gave me the chance to live in different countries (I did my PhD in Oxford and went to Lyon and Berkeley as a visiting student), travel to lots of conferences in exciting places (e.g. Korea) and make friends with other mathematicians from all over the world! Overall, I couldn't imagine a better choice of vocation!

What about your live beyond research?

When I'm not in the office, I'm likely to be riding a horse or out and about with my mates.

Why did you apply for the HLF13?

The idea of inter-mathematical communication really appeals to me - so many of the greatest results lie in between several mathematical areas. In order to understand or even contribute to such research, I strongly believe it's important to mix and discuss with as well as learn from people working on different topics. To learn from people on top of their game like the laureates is a chance not to be missed!

What do you expect from this meeting?

A week full of fun and work, interesting people and discussions!

.....

This blog post originates from the official blog of the 1st Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF) which takes place September 22 - 27, 2013 in Heidelberg, Germany. 40 Abel, Fields, and Turing Laureates will gather to meet a select group of 200 young researchers. Beatrice Lugger is a member of the HLF blog team. Please find all her postings on the HLF blog.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe