Want to Be a Science Journalist Next Summer?

The AAAS Mass Media Fellowship is an incredible opportunity for scientists to hone their writing skills

Karl Smith on assignment at the New York Botanical Garden during his AAAS Mass Media Fellowship last summer.

KARL SMITH 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you’re a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) graduate student or post-doc, and you have an itch to write science journalism for a major publication, an extraordinary opportunity is open to you. The AAAS Mass Media Fellowship program is accepting applications­­ from now until January 15, 2017, and if you apply and get accepted, you could be writing for Scientific American next summer, just like I did last summer.

The program embeds about 15 scientists in major news organizations around the country. Last summer, the other fellows in the program wrote for WIRED, Slate, National Geographic, and NPR, as well as newspapers and television stations, and wrote articles that collectively were seen by millions of people. Some of us have decided to pursue careers in science journalism, while other hope to use the skills we acquired to be better science communicators inside and outside the academy.

I’d been an English major before coming to graduate school for Biophysics at the University of Rochester five years ago, and I knew I wanted to continue writing even as I developed as a scientist. I started several projects to do this, including a podcast about life in graduate school (The Bench Warmer’s Podcast) and an ongoing venture where I use a manual typewriter to write STEM-themed stories for children, but it wasn’t until I was accepted into the AAAS Mass Media program and came to the Manhattan offices of Scientific American that I felt that my writing was contributing to the important conversations going on in the world.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


During the ten weeks of the fellowship, I got to interview scientists from France and Holland; a British Lord; and the retired former assistant unit commander of the LAPD’s S.W.A.T. team. I had to sprint to the New York Botanical Garden in the Bronx to catch the opening of a corpse flower and film the reactions of patrons who came to smell something terrible and did just that. I learned how to write under tight deadlines and how to get an interviewee to say something worth quoting.

I got to sit in on editorial meetings and hear what editors are looking for. I discussed how to balance narrative and scientific specificity with the other interns from our lunchroom, which happened to have a spectacular view of the Statue of Liberty. I got to write about swordfish, climate change, the pace of world record breaking, the nature of athletic practice, and killer robots. All told I wrote eight articles for ScientificAmerican.com, and two more that are currently in press for the print magazine.

The fellowship is paid, and includes a session in Washington, DC where current science writers share their expertise and tips on how to get started. If you are qualified and interested, be sure to apply. The experience changed my life, and I’m sure it will change yours.

About Karl Smith

Karl J.P. Smith was a 2016 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Scientific American and is a current PhD candidate in biophysics, computation, and structural biology at the University of Rochester. He is the typewriting storyteller behind the 10 Cent Story Project and is the co-creator of the Bench Warmer's Podcast.

More by Karl Smith

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe