Cities and Geological Risk

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice."

Will Durant (1885 - 1981) American writer, historian, and philosopher


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fig.1. Woodcut of the "terrible and great" water-flood from the Rhine river in the year 1651.

The location or site of a city is influenced by political as well as geomorphologic and geological factors. Cities are concentrated on shores of rivers or lakes which can be used as transport route and provide drinkable water. Sites where a river can be forded or waterfalls and rapids occur can become a natural meeting point for people. Harbors facing the sea are important gateways for international commerce. Peninsulas or a hilly landscape can act as natural barrier and help to defend the city against enemies. Fluvial plains are flat and provide enough space for the urban infrastructure, including zones for agriculture and forests to provide food and timber. The underground should be a stable substrate suitable for larger buildings, with a firm rock base and well-drained soil. The underground can also provide rocks for construction purpose or precious resources like salt, metals or medicated waters.

Unfortunately such favorable geological conditions are often associated with increased geological activity. River plains are often also still active flood plains, like in the case of New Orleans. Harbors, like San Francisco, developed along rugged coasts where oceanic plates move under continental plates. Islands and regions with active volcanoes and volcanic soils, like in Indonesia, are very fertile and attract people. In contrast, seismically stable regions like Siberia or the interior of Australia are strongly weathered and the soils are depleted of nutrients.

Considering the distribution of earthquakes and volcanoes and the density of population, the most dangerous areas are located around the Pacific Ocean (the notorious ring of fire). The islands and peninsulas of the Indian Ocean, the interior of Africa, and the countries in the Near East and surrounding the Mediterranean Sea are also at risk.

Fig.2. Simplified map with plate boundaries, earthquake, volcanoes and larger cities with more than one million inhabitants, modified after U.S.G.S. 2005.

Main problems of modern cities are high growth rate of the population, no adequate infrastructure and development schemes, limited space, mismanagement and corruption. The concentration of humans and infrastructure in narrow spaces increases the impact from natural hazards, and even small disasters can have great effects.

Also, modern technology and industry tend to be concentrated in single sites. At the same time globalization tends to interconnect economies worldwide - a local catastrophe can have worldwide economics repercussions.

Living in cities also poses the danger that people lose awareness of natural hazards. In slightly modified or rural areas traces of past catastrophes can be observed for a long time. Landslide scars or deposits of debris flows for example act as reminder of the instability of the underground. In urbanized areas these traces tend to be smoothed or cancelled to build new infrastructures.

The late 19th and 20th century was characterized by city planners and engineers developing technical counter-measures to prevent catastrophes, like dams, canals, and protection barriers. Most of these measures are built to prevent short term events of lower magnitude, producing the false impression that floods or massive processes in general are extraordinary large and rare events. People behind the protection wall tend to be less vigilant or reduce private mitigation measures. When an event large enough to overcome the protection barriers happens, the results are even more disastrous.

Today technical measures are combined with sociological - authorities try to teach knowledge of natural events and awareness of the possible risks to better manage the response of single individuals and society to such a danger.

Bibliography:

BOTKIN, D.B. & KELLER, E.A. (2011): Environmental Science - Earth as a Living Planet. John Wiley & Sons: 658

CHESTER, D.K.; DEGG, M.; DUNCAN, A.M. & GUEST, J.E. (2001): The increasing exposure of cities to the effects of volcanic eruptions: a global survey. Environmental Hazards 2: 89-103

My name is David Bressan and I'm a freelance geologist working mainly in the Austroalpine crystalline rocks and the South Alpine Palaeozoic and Mesozoic cover-sediments in the Eastern Alps. I graduated with a project on Rock Glaciers dynamics and hydrology, this phase left a special interest for quaternary deposits and modern glacial environments. During my research on glaciers, studying old maps, photography and reports on the former extent of these features, I became interested in history, especially the development of geomorphologic and geological concepts by naturalists and geologists. Living in one of the key area for the history of geology, I combine field trips with the historic research done in these regions, accompanied by historic maps and depictions. I discuss broadly also general geological concepts, especially in glaciology, seismology, volcanology, palaeontology and the relationship of society and geology.

More by David Bressan

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe