EQLs VS UFOs

“Swamp gas?” Mulder, F.W. in the "X-Files " (1993) Summer is traditionally Silly Season, when newspapers publish strange stories about aliens and monsters again and again to bridge holiday time - and so will July on "History of Geology" be dedicated to frivolous science stories...

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"Swamp gas?"

Mulder, F.W. in the “X-Files ” (1993)

Summer is traditionally Silly Season, when newspapers publish strange stories about aliens and monsters again and again to bridge holiday time – and so will July on “History of Geology” be dedicated to frivolous science stories…


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Earthquake Lights - or short EQLs - seem to be old phenomena. Irish engineer and amateur seismologist Robert Mallet published in 1851-1855 a catalog, where he dated back EQLs to biblical times, interpreting descriptions of fire-columns in the bible as early misidentifications of EQL. The Italian priest and amateur naturalist Ignazio Galli (1841-1920) published in 1910, based on a collection of events from ten centuries, a first classification scheme of EQLs. In his book "Raccolta e classificazione dei fenomeni luminosi osservati nei terremoti" (Collection and Classification of luminous phenomena observed during earthquakes) he recognizes four categories: short-lasting diffuse lights, long-lasting diffuse lights, flames and luminescent clouds and finally moving lights (globes and columns). He also notes that the different categories show different temporal patterns, short-lasting lights like flashes occur mostly before a quake, clouds and orbs during a quake and flames after an event. However nobody could explain the origin of these apparitions. One of the most plausible hypothesis at the time, proposed by Italian seismologist Giovanni Ciuseppe Bianconi in 1840, explained the lights as burning gas, emanating from fissures opening during a quake. However burning gas could explain only small flames, not large-scale glowing clouds.

Today's working hypotheses consider electromagnetic effects behind EQLs; this could also explain reports of malfunctions of electric devices (especially telephones) during such events. Electric charges can accumulate over time during the tectonic deformation of rocks, during an earthquake this electric energy is suddenly released in form of a visible spark. EQLs could also be a sort of glowing gas, formed by the ionizing properties of some rocks.

Some researchers made even a connection of EQLs to another, supposedly unexplained phenomenon - Unidentified Flying Objects, in short UFOs. In 1977 the psychologists Michael A. Persinger and Ghislaine Lafreniere published the book "Space-Time Transients and Unusual Events", arguing that UFOs are misidentified electric sparks caused by accumulating telluric-electric charges. Going a step further, some UFOlogists speculated that the generated electric fields are strong enough to influence a bystander´s mind and cause hallucinations. To support their hypothesis the authors tried to correlate UFOs sightings with the seismic zones in the U.S., however there seems to be also a high correlation with booze consumption...

Fig.2. UFOs, UFOs everywhere .... simplified map with seismic activity in the United States and supposed areas of increased UFOs sightings in 1870-1960, modified after PERSINGER.

My name is David Bressan and I'm a freelance geologist working mainly in the Austroalpine crystalline rocks and the South Alpine Palaeozoic and Mesozoic cover-sediments in the Eastern Alps. I graduated with a project on Rock Glaciers dynamics and hydrology, this phase left a special interest for quaternary deposits and modern glacial environments. During my research on glaciers, studying old maps, photography and reports on the former extent of these features, I became interested in history, especially the development of geomorphologic and geological concepts by naturalists and geologists. Living in one of the key area for the history of geology, I combine field trips with the historic research done in these regions, accompanied by historic maps and depictions. I discuss broadly also general geological concepts, especially in glaciology, seismology, volcanology, palaeontology and the relationship of society and geology.

More by David Bressan

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe