Save Siccar Point !!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


March 17, 1785 the "famous philosopher of the fossils" & agronomist James Hutton presented to the Royal Society his "dissertation", "Concerning the System of the Earth, Its Duration, and Stability." For the first time he proposed in public his theory that Earth was much older than previously believed. One of the most important evidence for his theory was an outcrop along the rugged coast of Siccar Point in Scotland. Here two geologic formations are separated by a so called "unconformity".

Fig.1. The angular unconformity at Siccar Point, one of the key outcrops for Hutton to demonstrate the validity of his theory. This illustration was made by Sir James Hull in 1788, during an excursion lead by Hutton.

Hutton, observing the different tilted layers of the sediments, realized that the gap between these layers was telling a complex geologic history:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


- 1) Once the strata of the first formation had to be slowly deposited horizontally in the sea,

- 2) then uplifted and tilted.

- 3) Once again above the sea level, erosion took place, working slowly but incessant to remove the rocks.

- 4) Again tectonic movements took place and pushed the remaining rock-formation below the sea level.

- 5) Here again sedimentation slowly accumulated layers of sediments to form a new geologic formation.

- 6) Finally, the two formations were pulled above sea level, where eventually geologist could observe and study them for a brief (geological) time, before future erosion will again dismantle the rocks...

Ever single step represents a vast period of time, not even considering the time lost in the missing, because eroded rocks, truly, as Hutton will write in his "Theory of the Earth" in 1788 "we find no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end."

Now this keystone of earth's history is threatened by the construction of a pipeline for agricultural wastes (oh, the Irony…). Geologists - but not only - all over the world should oppose to this short-sighted approach and Save Siccar Point !!*

*Addendum : As pointed out to me, Siccar Point itself is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) since 1961. The pipeline will not (!) enter the protected area of Siccar Point and the area surrounding the protected site is already used for farming (with various canals ending in the sea). An issue - under scrutiny at the moment - remains possible biological waste of unspecified composition washed by currents or tides ashore on the site.

My name is David Bressan and I'm a freelance geologist working mainly in the Austroalpine crystalline rocks and the South Alpine Palaeozoic and Mesozoic cover-sediments in the Eastern Alps. I graduated with a project on Rock Glaciers dynamics and hydrology, this phase left a special interest for quaternary deposits and modern glacial environments. During my research on glaciers, studying old maps, photography and reports on the former extent of these features, I became interested in history, especially the development of geomorphologic and geological concepts by naturalists and geologists. Living in one of the key area for the history of geology, I combine field trips with the historic research done in these regions, accompanied by historic maps and depictions. I discuss broadly also general geological concepts, especially in glaciology, seismology, volcanology, palaeontology and the relationship of society and geology.

More by David Bressan

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe