Dali's reinterpretation of Rembrandt's Self-Portrait

Salvador Dalí always thought of himself as a replacement for his older brother, who had died before the famous painter was born. Dalí’s theory is strengthened by the fact that his older brother had also been named Salvador. That’s creepy. We’re not certain if his art was a form of therapy, but it could explain some of his weird (and wonderful!) ideas. It is perhaps not surprising that double interpretations and images abound in Dali’s art.  Our new Illusions column in Scientific American: Mind, out this month, focuses on Dalí’s Doubles.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Salvador Dalí always thought of himself as a replacement for his older brother, who had died before the famous painter was born. Dalí’s theory is strengthened by the fact that his older brother had also been named Salvador. That’s creepy. We’re not certain if his art was a form of therapy, but it could explain some of his weird (and wonderful!) ideas. It is perhaps not surprising that double interpretations and images abound in Dali’s art.  Our new Illusions column in Scientific American: Mind, out this month, focuses on Dalí’s Doubles.

The images below did not make it into the column due to space limitations. We include them here because they illustrate some of the ways in which Dali made old art new, while preserving the original image in his reinterpretation.   

Left: Changes in Great Masterpieces, Rembrandt, by Salvador Dali. Lithograph, 1974. Right: Rembrandt’s original self-portrait.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dalí said that the sixteenth-century Italian painter Giuseppe Arcimboldo’s composite portraits of fruits and other objects inspired him to create double images in his own art. Whereas many of Arcimboldo’s portraits are examples of mosaicism, where a large object such as a hat is made up of smaller ones such as grapes and leaves, Dalí’s ambiguous images usually involve reversals of figure and background. In Changes in Great Masterpieces, Rembrandt (1974), Dalí saw an open door and receding dark hallway in the self-portrait of Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-1669). The viewer’s perception oscillates from Rembrandt’s portrait to the hallway picture, and back to the portrait again. Squinting one’s eyes helps to make the hallway the dominant scene, by blurring the details of the door and hallway. This peculiar switching of background elements and subject matter was popularized during the nineteenth- and twentieth-centuries by Gestalt psychologists, who attempted to understand perception as a whole, rather than as the sum of its parts.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe