Fat Tuesday: Believe in Will Power, and You Shall Have It

Some people believe that will power is a bodily function that requires glucose to power it. Carol Dweck's new paper shows that its not so.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


“Try? Try? There is no try. Only do.” –Master Yoda

Some people believe that will power is a bodily function that requires glucose to power it. An interesting idea, especially if you are using your will power to resist eating sugar. The belief must also technically be true, at least at its most fundamental level, since will power—if such a thing actually exists (I wouldn’t know)—must be a function of the brain. Since the brain needs glucose like any other organ, it must be that will power burns glucose. But so what? In this sense it’s trivial because everything burns glucose. The current believe on will power is more specific: it says that will power depletes glucose and that ingesting glucose hastens the recovery of will power. So, if you invoke will power does it also deplete all your other sugar-loving bodily functions? Like, um, life itself? Can you literally will yourself into an insulinemic coma, sucking all the sugar from your blood in a flurry of OCD-like focus on, well, anything?

Carol Dweck, of Stanford University, didn’t think so. She contributed her inaugural article as a new member of the National Academy of Science to their proceedings journal (PNAS), which tested the alternative theory that will power’s success, and depletion, depends more on the attitude of the wielder than on glucose consumption. If you believe that will power can be depleted, it will be, and vice versa.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists asked hundreds of subjects whether they thought will power could be depleted and then asked them to drink either a sugary soda or a diet soda, followed by a pair of demanding tasks involving self-control The sugar drinkers did better, and lasted longer, if and only if they believed will power was depletable.

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe