Fat Tuesday: Surgery for everyone! How science validated the gastric bypass.

An important and exciting piece of research just came out in Science Magazine last week showing why gastric bypass surgery has such powerful curative effects on diabetes, beyond the previous belief that the dietary restriction helps diabetes.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Male_Abdominal_obesity.jpg

An important and exciting piece of research just came out in Science Magazine last week showing why gastric bypass surgery has such powerful curative effects on diabetes, beyond the previous belief that the dietary restriction helps diabetes. This is critical as it suggests that it is the physical reorganization of the gut, and not the change of diet modify glucose metabolism and lead to remission in diabetes. This new work caps a series of research over the last several years that led to my own gastric bypass 5 months ago. As a physiologist I was puzzled, in my discussions with my surgeons and in my reading of the literature, why patients commonly go into the hospital for surgery as diabetes, and leave a few days later in full remission. Surely, if it was the case that the dietary restriction caused this, the obvious treatment for diabetes would be to starve yourself for a few days the minute you were diagnosed. But it doesn’t work, so dietary restriction cannot explain the effects of the surgery either.

The surgery, which reduces the stomach to about the size of an egg, rearranges the intestines into the shape of a Y. Nicholas Stylopoulos, of Boston Children’s Hospital in Massachusetts, led his team to perform the surgery on obese and non-obese diabetic rats, and then watched for changes. They found that Roux-en-Y-treated rats increased ingestion of sugar. As a result, the intestine became a major source of whole-body glucose control.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

http://www.sciencemag.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/content/341/6144/351/F1.expansion.html

With the new animal model in hand, researchers can now determine exactly what happens in the surgery to accomplish this, and they can potentially develop pharmaceuticals to accomplish the same effects, and, hopefully, cure type II diabetes in the future without surgical intervention.

In the meantime, the research validates the important, and perhaps uniquely curative, role that gastric bypass plays in controlling diabetes. It is a heavy blow to pundits who claim that the only role of the surgery is to restrict diet, and that it is therefore fundamentally unnecessary.

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe