Happier and Younger (Looking)

Long face no longer: A new study confirms that smiling makes you look younger

Harold Lloyd’s famous grin in Who's Who on the Screen, 1920. Unknown photographer. Wikimedia Commons.  

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Perception is not easily separable from emotion, a fact that magicians often exploit in their acts. Hilarity in a magic show not only entertains, but it also misdirects. Johnny Thompson (aka The Great Tomsoni) says that when the audience laughs, time stops – and the magician can get away with a lot more than if spectators had been intently watching with somber faces.

A paper published 2 weeks ago in the journal PLOS ONE reveals another kind of everyday misdirection that is also based on positive emotion. Psychologists Norah C. Hass, Trent D. Weston, and Seung-Lark Lim, of the University of Missouri-Kansas City, set out to investigate if there is any truth to the intuition that smiling makes us look younger.

To find out, they asked experimental (college-aged) subjects to judge whether a set of computer-generated male faces were ‘young’ or ‘old.’ The faces ranged in age from 30 to 65, and could have sad, happy, or neutral emotional expressions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Computer-generated faces used in the experiments. Ages ranged from 30 years old to 65 yeas old, in 5-year increments.

The results showed a definite effect of emotional expression on perceived age. Faces at the lower age range were more often judged as ‘old’ when they looked sad than when they were neutral. Likewise, faces at the higher age ranges were more often judged as ‘young’ if they looked happy than if they looked neutral. The authors concluded that facial emotion interacts with age perception in such a way that a happy expression elevates the threshold for being considered ‘old,’ while a sad expression lowers it.

Not that you should be grinning like a maniac when you take your next selfie—but something to keep in mind. 

 

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe