Illusions from the National Archives in New York City

National Archives of New York City archivist Christopher Zarr reveals how deeply the art form of camouflage was pursued 100 years ago during World War I

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A century ago military powers used sophisticated visual shape-disrupting techniques to conceal weapons of war, and to hide resources during wartime. The artform was mastered by members of the Women's Reserve—NYC art students who signed up and used their knowledge to enhance the art of camouflage and deception. They developed numerous techniques to camouflage individuals. Camouflage functions by either decreasing contrast of the object being hidden, or by disrupting its shape profile so that the hidden object cannot easily be identified and/or properly categorized.

The Women's Reserve at work optimizing camouflage uniforms. Credit: War Department. 1789-9/18/1947 

A Living Rock. Women’s Camouflage Reserve Corps, of the National League for Women’s Service. Credit: NARA 165-WW-599G-13


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Women Reserve also camouflaged naval vessels, and the US Navy had its own office dedicated to the critical function, as did foreign navies such as the British Navy. Naval designs were intended to make the ships more difficult to track and precisely position, so as to thwart would-be torpedo attacks.

The mock battleship “Recruit” during WWI. Docked in Union Square. Credit: War Department. 1789-9/18/1947

The US Navy studied hundreds of camouflage patterns. Credit: Underwood & Underwood.

Scaled miniatured mockups were tested to ensure pattern effectiveness. Credit: Underwood & Underwood. 

A British pattern for a cargo ship. Credit: Department of the Navy. Bureau of Construction and Repair. 1862-1940

Credit: Champions of Illusion Book

 

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe