Inspired to Believe: The Connection between Inspirational Experiences and Belief in God

The more people feel inspired in their daily lives, the more strongly they believe in God, new research shows 

North Italian Painter (first quarter 14th century), Two Angels (detail), Bequest of Edward Fowles, 1971.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Thomas Alva Edison famously opined that genius is “one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration.” Though the inventor and businessman fell short of self-identifying as an atheist, he also asserted, in a 1910 New York Times Magazine interview, that “Nature did it all—not the gods of the religions.” New research suggests that Edison’s two statements above—and similar others he made—could be more intrinsically connected than it might seem at first sight: people who experience more inspiration in their lives tend to be stronger believers in God.

Research had previously shown that individuals with more analytical cognitive styles are less likely to be believers. The new study, published in Psychological Science by Clayton R. Critcher and Chan Jean Lee of University of California, Berkeley, and KAIST, set out to determine the experimental origins of belief in God. They conducted a series of studies in California and Korea, to test the hypothesis that feeling inspired encourages a belief in God, and that it does so because “inspiration offers a transcendent experience that produces feelings of connection to something greater than the self.”

Participants completed multiple scales, including surveys of the strength of their belief in God, of their perception of God as loving versus controlling, and of how commonly and deeply they felt inspired in their day-to-day lives.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The most fascinating component of the study may have been the authors’ attempt to connect religious belief to “the chills” that people can feel in response to emotional events. Unbeknownst to me before reading this paper, there are two different kinds of chills, wonderfully known as goosetingles and coldshivers. Goosetingles, as indicated by their name, are “a combination of goosebumps and a tingling sensation, whereas coldshivers reflects a mix of coldness and a literal physical shake.” (I have personally experienced the former not infrequently, in response to music or poetry, but I’m not aware of having felt the latter). 

Alas, the data showed no correlation between the belief in God and either goosetingles or coldshivers. Instead, the researchers found a significant correlation between inspiration and belief: the more participants felt inspired in their daily lives, the more strongly they believed in God. This connection held for those who saw God as loving, and also for those that saw God as controlling—but it was unrelated to people’s general beliefs about positive possibilities (such as life in other planets, or the spread of democracy).

In a subsequent manipulation, participants were randomly assigned to write about and relive a memory of: feeling inspired by something or someone, feeling inspired to do something, or feeling emotionally neutral/mildly bored. Reliving an inspired-by experience enhanced religious belief in not only believers but also skeptics. An additional experimental scenario showed that being awed (by a nature video) did not similarly increase participants’ belief in God.

For their final experiment, the scientists left the predominantly Christian cultural context of the US for Korea, where nonreligious people and Buddhists combine to form a population majority. In Korea, the experimental manipulation consisted of assigning subjects to an inspiration condition versus a control condition. In the inspiration condition, participants watched a TV talent show in which a formerly homeless contestant defied expectations by offering a rousing performance. In the control condition, participants watched Psy’s “Gangnam Style” music video. As intended, participants felt more inspired after watching the talent show than the Gangnam Style video—though the paper clarifies that participants enjoyed the Gangnam Style video more. The inspiration video enhanced religious belief irrespective of the participants’ religious affiliation (Christian, Buddhist, or nonreligious). 

The researchers concluded that being inspired may boost belief in God because it offers a feeling of being connected to something greater than oneself. Though it could also be the other way around: the act of believing in God might cause the feeling of inspiration and connection. It gives me the goosetingles either way I think about it.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe