February 14, 2014

Its Loves Illusions I Recall

Gianni Sarcone's illusions are beautiful and evocative of our most cherished emotion.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

Title: ‘E-motion’, by Gianni A. Sarcone

Gianni Sarcone has been a frequent contestant in the Best Illusion of the Year Contest, and also in our previous article on illusions of love. But he is hands down the most prolific illusion lover—or love illusioner—in the world. What can I say? He’s Italian.

His illusions are beautiful and evocative of our most cherished emotion.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

So to celebrate Valentine’s Day, we Illusion Chasers are celebrating his lovely creations. Here are a few below from his new gallery of kinoptical illusions. Kinoptic illusions are static images that appear to move due to processes in the brain.

>>> SEE OUR LATEST SPECIAL ISSUE WITH MORE LOVE ILLUSIONS HERE

>>>READ ABOUT OUR LOVE LIVES HERE

Description from our Special Issue: The yellow fields inside the heart seem paler than the fields forming the contour of the heart, which appear to be a darker shade of yellow-orange. Right? Wrong. Actually all the yellow fields in the figure are identical. Any differences that you see are all in your mind. This effect is called neon color spreading because it resembles the effect of the light spreading from a neon lamp. The neural underpinnings of this effect are not yet understood.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American