Neuroscience in fiction: "Of a Sweet Slow Dance in the Wake of Temporary Dogs", by Adam-Troy Castro

The people of Enysbourg lead merry, fulfilled, blissful lives - nine days out of every ten. On each Tenth Day, the country is ablaze with destruction.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Image source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eclipse#mediaviewer/File:Eclipse667.jpg

“Either way I know that I’ve never been happy, not before I came here. Here I found my love of being alive – but only nine days out of ten”.

The people of Enysbourg lead merry, fulfilled, blissful lives – nine days out of every ten. On each Tenth Day, the country is ablaze with destruction. Cities are razed, children massacred, every single citizen and visitor to the country experiences unimaginable pain and suffering. But the Day After, peace is restored. All wounds, physical and psychological, are healed. Buildings and roads show no fractures. Families become whole again. Lovers reunite. Memories of the devastation remain, but they do not have the power to do harm.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To make things even more interesting, boats only arrive to, and leave Enysbourg, on the Day After. Enysbourg’s natives accept their home’s idiosyncrasies and willingly pay the price: one day of perfect misery for nine days of perfect happiness. Travellers, who visit the island to escape their mediocre, unsubstantial, uninspired lives abroad, must face the decision, every Day After, to return to the dullness they came from, or to commit to another ten-day cycle in Enysbourg.

It is altogether not an easy choice, although perhaps for different reasons than described in Adam-Troy Castro’s short story. To the brain, there is no absolute black and white, but they only appear so when pitched against each other. Our sensory processes are built to detect, enhance, and signal contrast in the world. The same applies to our thoughts and memories. Would we know that we were truly happy if we had never known sadness?

It could be that those who stay in Enysbourg are joyful not in spite of the Tenth Day, but because of it.

 

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe